[PATCH -mm] softlockup-improve-debug-output.patch fix
kernel/softlockup.c: In function 'softlockup_tick':
kernel/softlockup.c:125: warning: 'regs' is used uninitialized in this function
So let's fix softlockup-improve-debug-output.patch to actually work,
and do what it claimed in the changelog :-)
Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
softlockup.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- kernel/softlockup.c~fix 2007-09-02 04:23:49.0 +0530
+++ kernel/softlockup.c 2007-09-02 04:34:45.0 +0530
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ void softlockup_tick(void)
int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
unsigned long touch_timestamp = per_cpu(touch_timestamp, this_cpu);
unsigned long print_timestamp;
- struct pt_regs *regs;
+ struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs();
unsigned long now;
if (touch_timestamp == 0) {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH -mm] softlockup-improve-debug-output.patch fix
kernel/softlockup.c: In function 'softlockup_tick':
kernel/softlockup.c:125: warning: 'regs' is used uninitialized in this function
So let's fix softlockup-improve-debug-output.patch to actually work,
and do what it claimed in the changelog :-)
Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
softlockup.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- kernel/softlockup.c~fix 2007-09-02 04:23:49.0 +0530
+++ kernel/softlockup.c 2007-09-02 04:34:45.0 +0530
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ void softlockup_tick(void)
int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
unsigned long touch_timestamp = per_cpu(touch_timestamp, this_cpu);
unsigned long print_timestamp;
- struct pt_regs *regs;
+ struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs();
unsigned long now;
if (touch_timestamp == 0) {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
