On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 11:44:27AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 3/5/07, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> +int __init oprofile_arch_init(struct oprofile_operations *ops)
> >> +{
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_HARDWARE_PM
> >[snip]
> >> +#else
> >> + return -1;
> >> +#endif
> >> +}
> >
> >Uh.
On 3/5/07, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +int __init oprofile_arch_init(struct oprofile_operations *ops)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HARDWARE_PM
[snip]
> +#else
> + return -1;
> +#endif
> +}
Uh.. fix your dependencies.
can you elaborate ?
-mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On 3/3/07, Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +#if defined(CONFIG_MTD_UCLINUX)
> + /* generic memory mapped MTD driver */
> + memory_mtd_end = memory_end;
> +
> + mtd_phys = _ramstart;
> + mtd_size = PAGE_ALIGN(*((unsigned long *)(mtd_phys + 8)));
> +
> +# if defined(CONFI
On 3/5/07, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +config DEBUG_HUNT_FOR_ZERO
> + bool "Catch NULL pointer reads/writes"
> + default y
Is this sane to have conditional?
yes ... with the ability to change the load address of the kernel, you
can create a reserved chunk of memory for use
On Mon 5 Mar 2007 12:32, Paul Mundt pondered:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:29:19AM -0500, Robin Getz wrote:
> > On Mon 5 Mar 2007 09:00, Paul Mundt pondered:
> > > Throwing this all at the user simply shows that the functions being
> > > relocated haven't been profiled adequately with real workload
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:29:19AM -0500, Robin Getz wrote:
> On Mon 5 Mar 2007 09:00, Paul Mundt pondered:
> > Throwing this all at the user simply shows that the functions being
> > relocated haven't been profiled adequately with real workloads.
>
> Actually - that is not true at all - we have
On Monday 05 March 2007, Wu, Bryan wrote:
> Maybe NUMA is a solution, but it is not a wonderful solution.
NUMA doesn't help you. Linux only runs on cache-coherent NUMA,
which this isn't.
> In some application product, BF561 core A is running Linux kernel
> +Applications while BF561 core B is just
On Mon 5 Mar 2007 09:00, Paul Mundt pondered:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:26:56AM -0500, Robin Getz wrote:
> > On Mon 5 Mar 2007 07:39, Paul Mundt pondered:
> > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:32:07PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > That is what this does - it is just a easy to use knob.
>
> Thi
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:26:56AM -0500, Robin Getz wrote:
> On Mon 5 Mar 2007 07:39, Paul Mundt pondered:
> > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:32:07PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> > > This is done intentionally, because it's also possible for user code to
> > > be loaded into L1 memory.?? We want to
On Mon 5 Mar 2007 07:39, Paul Mundt pondered:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:32:07PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> > Paul Mundt wrote:
> > >>+comment "Memory Optimizations"
> > >>+
> > >>+config I_ENTRY_L1
> > >>+ bool "Locate interrupt entry code in L1 Memory"
> > >>+ default y
> > >>+
Paul Mundt wrote:
+comment "Memory Optimizations"
+
+config I_ENTRY_L1
+ bool "Locate interrupt entry code in L1 Memory"
+ default y
+ help
+ If enabled interrupt entry code (STORE/RESTORE CONTEXT) is linked
+ into L1 instruction memory.(less latency)
+
Wow, thi
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:32:07PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Paul Mundt wrote:
> >>+comment "Memory Optimizations"
> >>+
> >>+config I_ENTRY_L1
> >>+ bool "Locate interrupt entry code in L1 Memory"
> >>+ default y
> >>+ help
> >>+ If enabled interrupt entry code (STORE/RESTORE CONTEXT
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:14:40PM +0800, Wu, Bryan wrote:
> Here is the update version of blackfin-arch.patch in -mm tree.
> simply add support to utrace and it was tested on blackfin STAMP board
> as well as other following patches.
>
> The whole patch is located at URL:
> https://blackfin.uclin
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 09:47 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 05 March 2007, Aubrey Li wrote:
> > On 3/4/07, Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > In general, please put EXPORT_SYMBOL lines below the definition
> > > of the symbol itself. This list of exports should only be used
>
On Monday 05 March 2007, Aubrey Li wrote:
> On 3/4/07, Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In general, please put EXPORT_SYMBOL lines below the definition
> > of the symbol itself. This list of exports should only be used
> > for symbols that come from assembly files.
>
> What is the rig
On Monday 05 March 2007, Wu, Bryan wrote:
> So could please give us some information about the merge window
> schedule, we may try to catch this.
The merge window opens after 2.6.21 gets released and is open for
two weeks aftre that. The idea is however that you have everything
ready at the sta
On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 17:30 -0500, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 01 March 2007 05:14:40 Wu, Bryan wrote:
> > Here is the update version of blackfin-arch.patch in -mm tree.
> > simply add support to utrace and it was tested on blackfin STAMP
> board
> > as well as other following patches.
>
>
On 3/4/07, Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 01 March 2007 05:14:40 Wu, Bryan wrote:
> Here is the update version of blackfin-arch.patch in -mm tree.
> simply add support to utrace and it was tested on blackfin STAMP board
> as well as other following patches.
Wow, this has co
On Saturday 03 March 2007 23:50:02 bert hubert wrote:
> > for (;;)
> > asm volatile ("idle");
>
> This looks remarkably like relax_cpu()
Actually not: cpu_relax() is defined as barrier(), it can't
call idle because that might make it sleep for a indefinite
amount of time (until
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 11:30:49PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> It might be nicer to make this
>
> for (;;)
> asm volatile ("idle");
This looks remarkably like relax_cpu()
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software
http://netherlabs.nl
On Thursday 01 March 2007 05:14:40 Wu, Bryan wrote:
> Here is the update version of blackfin-arch.patch in -mm tree.
> simply add support to utrace and it was tested on blackfin STAMP board
> as well as other following patches.
Wow, this has come a long way since I looked at the patches last
year,
On Thursday 01 March 2007 05:14:40 Wu, Bryan wrote:
> The whole patch is located at URL:
> https://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/download/frsrelease/39/2583/blackfin-arch.p
>atch The incremental patch is located at URL:
> https://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/download/frsrelease/39/2584/blackfin-arch-m
>m2-upd
Hi folks,
Here is the update version of blackfin-arch.patch in -mm tree.
simply add support to utrace and it was tested on blackfin STAMP board
as well as other following patches.
The whole patch is located at URL:
https://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/download/frsrelease/39/2583/blackfin-arch.patch
Th
23 matches
Mail list logo
