Re: [PATCH 0/2] Embedding Position Independent Executables

2016-04-23 Thread Afzal Mohammed
Hi, On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 12:49:58AM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > I think Heiko clarified it but there are actually multiple platforms > that will benefit from this infrastructure. I can name at least at91, > rockchip, sunxi and am335x. On am335x, this has been solved by running > that cod

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Embedding Position Independent Executables

2016-04-22 Thread Alexandre Belloni
Hi, On 04/04/2016 at 10:57:57 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote : > [Manually reformatted your email so I can reply to it sensibly - please > don't make me have to do this again, next time I'll ignore your message > as it's too much effort, thanks] > Well, I fixed my editor configuration so

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Embedding Position Independent Executables

2016-04-04 Thread Heiko Stuebner
Am Montag, 4. April 2016, 10:57:57 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux: > [Manually reformatted your email so I can reply to it sensibly - please > don't make me have to do this again, next time I'll ignore your message > as it's too much effort, thanks] > > On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 09:23:52AM +0200,

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Embedding Position Independent Executables

2016-04-04 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
[Manually reformatted your email so I can reply to it sensibly - please don't make me have to do this again, next time I'll ignore your message as it's too much effort, thanks] On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 09:23:52AM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > Hi, > > This series tries to revive the many series

[PATCH 0/2] Embedding Position Independent Executables

2016-04-03 Thread Alexandre Belloni
Hi, This series tries to revive the many series trying to achieve the same thing. I've tried numerous approaches and while using the kernel module loader is actually quite convenient from a relocation point of view it is quite overkill and also it is quite often too late as a lot of the arch spec