Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-05 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 04-08-16 20:12, Luc Verhaegen wrote: On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 06:58:55PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: I didn't read the binding document[1], which I should have done. If simpledrm claims to be compatible with simple-framebuffer I assume it should support the entire binding doc which

Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-05 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 04-08-16 20:12, Luc Verhaegen wrote: On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 06:58:55PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: I didn't read the binding document[1], which I should have done. If simpledrm claims to be compatible with simple-framebuffer I assume it should support the entire binding doc which

Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread One Thousand Gnomes
> firmware framebuffer in early boot until a real driver takes over. It's a > replacement really for all the various uefi/vesa/whatever fbdev drivers. > Full reliance on the firmware very much intended. Most of those have firmware interfaces for things like colour setting and hardware scrolling.

Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread One Thousand Gnomes
> firmware framebuffer in early boot until a real driver takes over. It's a > replacement really for all the various uefi/vesa/whatever fbdev drivers. > Full reliance on the firmware very much intended. Most of those have firmware interfaces for things like colour setting and hardware scrolling.

Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread Luc Verhaegen
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 06:58:55PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: > > I didn't read the binding document[1], which I should have done. > If simpledrm claims to be compatible with simple-framebuffer I assume it > should support the entire binding doc which includes clocks, regulators > and having

Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread Luc Verhaegen
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 06:58:55PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: > > I didn't read the binding document[1], which I should have done. > If simpledrm claims to be compatible with simple-framebuffer I assume it > should support the entire binding doc which includes clocks, regulators > and having

Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread Noralf Trønnes
Den 04.08.2016 16:36, skrev Daniel Vetter: On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:03:18PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: This patchset adds the simpledrm driver by David Herrmann based on a patchset[1] from 2014. That patchset also included patches for kicking out simpledrm by real drivers. I have stayed

Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread Noralf Trønnes
Den 04.08.2016 16:36, skrev Daniel Vetter: On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:03:18PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: This patchset adds the simpledrm driver by David Herrmann based on a patchset[1] from 2014. That patchset also included patches for kicking out simpledrm by real drivers. I have stayed

Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:59:42PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:44:23PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > > > Do we really want to recreate a 400+ email thread again, or are we > > > capable of

Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:59:42PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:44:23PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > > > Do we really want to recreate a 400+ email thread again, or are we > > > capable of learning from the

Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread Noralf Trønnes
Den 04.08.2016 16:15, skrev Luc Verhaegen: On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:03:18PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: I have tested simpledrm on a Raspberry Pi B+ with U-boot setting up the framebuffer and producing this node: framebuffer@1e887000 { compatible =

Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread Noralf Trønnes
Den 04.08.2016 16:15, skrev Luc Verhaegen: On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:03:18PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: I have tested simpledrm on a Raspberry Pi B+ with U-boot setting up the framebuffer and producing this node: framebuffer@1e887000 { compatible =

Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread Luc Verhaegen
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:44:23PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > > Do we really want to recreate a 400+ email thread again, or are we > > capable of learning from the past? > > No we don't. And no-one intends to. I

Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread Luc Verhaegen
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:44:23PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > > Do we really want to recreate a 400+ email thread again, or are we > > capable of learning from the past? > > No we don't. And no-one intends to. I am fully aware of

Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > Do we really want to recreate a 400+ email thread again, or are we > capable of learning from the past? No we don't. And no-one intends to. I am fully aware of the discussion that introduced the clock-dependencies to

Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > Do we really want to recreate a 400+ email thread again, or are we > capable of learning from the past? No we don't. And no-one intends to. I am fully aware of the discussion that introduced the clock-dependencies to simplefb, and I

Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread Luc Verhaegen
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:08:43PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:15:25PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:03:18PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: > > > > > > I have tested simpledrm on a Raspberry Pi B+ with U-boot setting up the > > > framebuffer

Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread Luc Verhaegen
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:08:43PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:15:25PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:03:18PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: > > > > > > I have tested simpledrm on a Raspberry Pi B+ with U-boot setting up the > > > framebuffer

Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:15:25PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:03:18PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: > > > > I have tested simpledrm on a Raspberry Pi B+ with U-boot setting up the > > framebuffer and producing this node: > > > > framebuffer@1e887000 { > >

Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:15:25PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:03:18PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: > > > > I have tested simpledrm on a Raspberry Pi B+ with U-boot setting up the > > framebuffer and producing this node: > > > > framebuffer@1e887000 { > >

Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:03:18PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: > This patchset adds the simpledrm driver by David Herrmann based on a > patchset[1] from 2014. That patchset also included patches for kicking > out simpledrm by real drivers. I have stayed away from that since it > involves another

Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:03:18PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: > This patchset adds the simpledrm driver by David Herrmann based on a > patchset[1] from 2014. That patchset also included patches for kicking > out simpledrm by real drivers. I have stayed away from that since it > involves another

Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread Luc Verhaegen
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:03:18PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: > > I have tested simpledrm on a Raspberry Pi B+ with U-boot setting up the > framebuffer and producing this node: > > framebuffer@1e887000 { > compatible = "simple-framebuffer"; > reg =

Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread Luc Verhaegen
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:03:18PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: > > I have tested simpledrm on a Raspberry Pi B+ with U-boot setting up the > framebuffer and producing this node: > > framebuffer@1e887000 { > compatible = "simple-framebuffer"; > reg =

[PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread Noralf Trønnes
This patchset adds the simpledrm driver by David Herrmann based on a patchset[1] from 2014. That patchset also included patches for kicking out simpledrm by real drivers. I have stayed away from that since it involves another subsystem and I would probably be unable to answer any questions about

[PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

2016-08-04 Thread Noralf Trønnes
This patchset adds the simpledrm driver by David Herrmann based on a patchset[1] from 2014. That patchset also included patches for kicking out simpledrm by real drivers. I have stayed away from that since it involves another subsystem and I would probably be unable to answer any questions about