> 1. If LB_BIAS is false for nohz_full CPUs. This will help us figure out if
> rq->cpu_load
> is read for them.
lb_bias feature is not disabled for full dynticks. rq->cpu_load[] is
never used for them.
nohz_full cpus verify the condition on_null_domain(rq)
> 2. When a cpu reports scheduling
> 1. If LB_BIAS is false for nohz_full CPUs. This will help us figure out if
> rq->cpu_load
> is read for them.
lb_bias feature is not disabled for full dynticks. rq->cpu_load[] is
never used for them.
nohz_full cpus verify the condition on_null_domain(rq)
> 2. When a cpu reports scheduling
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 08:50:55AM -0400, preet...@andrew.cmu.edu wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 05:05:45PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >> I see nothing like the stuff I asked for in here, on top it creates the
> >> stupid tick.c file.
> >
> > Right. I initially thought that we should make
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 08:50:55AM -0400, preet...@andrew.cmu.edu wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 05:05:45PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
I see nothing like the stuff I asked for in here, on top it creates the
stupid tick.c file.
Right. I initially thought that we should make sched_tick()
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 05:05:45PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:44:02PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:22:23PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:55:36PM +0530, Vatika Harlalka wrote:
>> > > > This
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 05:05:45PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:44:02PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:22:23PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:55:36PM +0530, Vatika Harlalka wrote:
This patchset is for
Hi Peter :)
I'm very sorry about this. I should've gone through what was written
on the topic before
attempting to write this patch. I'll go through the link and work on
what is discussed
to make a new relevant patch.
Thanks
Vatika
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 05:05:45PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:44:02PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:22:23PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:55:36PM +0530, Vatika Harlalka wrote:
> > > > This patchset is
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:44:02PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:22:23PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:55:36PM +0530, Vatika Harlalka wrote:
> > > This patchset is for offloading task_tick() to a remote housekeeping
> > > cpu. The
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:22:23PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:55:36PM +0530, Vatika Harlalka wrote:
> > This patchset is for offloading task_tick() to a remote housekeeping
> > cpu. The larger aim is to stop ticks on nohz_full cpus. For this, extra
> > work must be
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:55:36PM +0530, Vatika Harlalka wrote:
> This patchset is for offloading task_tick() to a remote housekeeping
> cpu. The larger aim is to stop ticks on nohz_full cpus. For this, extra
> work must be done by housekeeping cpus. So, task_tick is called from a
> delayed
This patchset is for offloading task_tick() to a remote housekeeping
cpu. The larger aim is to stop ticks on nohz_full cpus. For this, extra
work must be done by housekeeping cpus. So, task_tick is called from a
delayed workqueue for nohz_full cpus and the work is requeued every second
for those
This patchset is for offloading task_tick() to a remote housekeeping
cpu. The larger aim is to stop ticks on nohz_full cpus. For this, extra
work must be done by housekeeping cpus. So, task_tick is called from a
delayed workqueue for nohz_full cpus and the work is requeued every second
for those
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:22:23PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:55:36PM +0530, Vatika Harlalka wrote:
This patchset is for offloading task_tick() to a remote housekeeping
cpu. The larger aim is to stop ticks on nohz_full cpus. For this, extra
work must be done by
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:55:36PM +0530, Vatika Harlalka wrote:
This patchset is for offloading task_tick() to a remote housekeeping
cpu. The larger aim is to stop ticks on nohz_full cpus. For this, extra
work must be done by housekeeping cpus. So, task_tick is called from a
delayed workqueue
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:44:02PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:22:23PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:55:36PM +0530, Vatika Harlalka wrote:
This patchset is for offloading task_tick() to a remote housekeeping
cpu. The larger aim is
Hi Peter :)
I'm very sorry about this. I should've gone through what was written
on the topic before
attempting to write this patch. I'll go through the link and work on
what is discussed
to make a new relevant patch.
Thanks
Vatika
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 05:05:45PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:44:02PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:22:23PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:55:36PM +0530, Vatika Harlalka wrote:
This patchset is for
18 matches
Mail list logo
