Re: [PATCH 0/2] s390: Use ARRAY_SIZE instead of reimplementing its function

2018-09-10 Thread Martin Schwidefsky
On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 18:26:26 +0800 zhong jiang wrote: > I find the issue with the help of Coccinelle. > > zhong jiang (2): > s390: vmlogrdr: Use ARRAY_SIZE instead of reimplementing its function > s390: qeth_core_mpc: Use ARRAY_SIZE instead of reimplementing its > function > >

Re: [PATCH 0/2] s390: Use ARRAY_SIZE instead of reimplementing its function

2018-09-10 Thread Martin Schwidefsky
On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 18:26:26 +0800 zhong jiang wrote: > I find the issue with the help of Coccinelle. > > zhong jiang (2): > s390: vmlogrdr: Use ARRAY_SIZE instead of reimplementing its function > s390: qeth_core_mpc: Use ARRAY_SIZE instead of reimplementing its > function > >

[PATCH 0/2] s390: Use ARRAY_SIZE instead of reimplementing its function

2018-09-08 Thread zhong jiang
I find the issue with the help of Coccinelle. zhong jiang (2): s390: vmlogrdr: Use ARRAY_SIZE instead of reimplementing its function s390: qeth_core_mpc: Use ARRAY_SIZE instead of reimplementing its function drivers/s390/char/vmlogrdr.c | 2 +- drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_mpc.c | 7

[PATCH 0/2] s390: Use ARRAY_SIZE instead of reimplementing its function

2018-09-08 Thread zhong jiang
I find the issue with the help of Coccinelle. zhong jiang (2): s390: vmlogrdr: Use ARRAY_SIZE instead of reimplementing its function s390: qeth_core_mpc: Use ARRAY_SIZE instead of reimplementing its function drivers/s390/char/vmlogrdr.c | 2 +- drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_mpc.c | 7