Re: [PATCH 0/2] uprobes: typeof(arch_uprobe->insn) cleanups

2013-11-11 Thread Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 06:53:50PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > Hello. > > Ananth, could you please explicitly ack or nack 2/2 ? It is > really simple, but obviously I can't test it. And even if it > is correct it should be merged only if you like it, this is > the minor cleanup. The changes

Re: [PATCH 0/2] uprobes: typeof(arch_uprobe-insn) cleanups

2013-11-11 Thread Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 06:53:50PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: Hello. Ananth, could you please explicitly ack or nack 2/2 ? It is really simple, but obviously I can't test it. And even if it is correct it should be merged only if you like it, this is the minor cleanup. The changes look

[PATCH 0/2] uprobes: typeof(arch_uprobe->insn) cleanups

2013-11-09 Thread Oleg Nesterov
Hello. Ananth, could you please explicitly ack or nack 2/2 ? It is really simple, but obviously I can't test it. And even if it is correct it should be merged only if you like it, this is the minor cleanup. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the

[PATCH 0/2] uprobes: typeof(arch_uprobe-insn) cleanups

2013-11-09 Thread Oleg Nesterov
Hello. Ananth, could you please explicitly ack or nack 2/2 ? It is really simple, but obviously I can't test it. And even if it is correct it should be merged only if you like it, this is the minor cleanup. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the