Re: [PATCH 0/2] virtio-scsi fixes for 3.6

2012-10-02 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 02/10/2012 10:18, James Bottomley ha scritto: > On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 15:11 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 26/07/2012 15:28, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto: >>> James, >>> >>> patch 1 fixes scanning of LUNs whose number is greater than 255. QEMU >>> passes a max_lun of 16383 (because it uses SAM n

Re: [PATCH 0/2] virtio-scsi fixes for 3.6

2012-10-02 Thread James Bottomley
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 15:11 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 26/07/2012 15:28, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto: > > James, > > > > patch 1 fixes scanning of LUNs whose number is greater than 255. QEMU > > passes a max_lun of 16383 (because it uses SAM numbering) but in Linux > > it must become 32768 (be

Re: [PATCH 0/2] virtio-scsi fixes for 3.6

2012-10-01 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 26/07/2012 15:28, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto: > James, > > patch 1 fixes scanning of LUNs whose number is greater than 255. QEMU > passes a max_lun of 16383 (because it uses SAM numbering) but in Linux > it must become 32768 (because LUNs above 255 are "relocated" to 16640). > Patch 2 is a resub

[PATCH 0/2] virtio-scsi fixes for 3.6

2012-07-26 Thread Paolo Bonzini
James, patch 1 fixes scanning of LUNs whose number is greater than 255. QEMU passes a max_lun of 16383 (because it uses SAM numbering) but in Linux it must become 32768 (because LUNs above 255 are "relocated" to 16640). Patch 2 is a resubmission of the patch for online resizing of virtio-scsi LUN