Il 02/10/2012 10:18, James Bottomley ha scritto:
> On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 15:11 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 26/07/2012 15:28, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
>>> James,
>>>
>>> patch 1 fixes scanning of LUNs whose number is greater than 255. QEMU
>>> passes a max_lun of 16383 (because it uses SAM n
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 15:11 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 26/07/2012 15:28, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
> > James,
> >
> > patch 1 fixes scanning of LUNs whose number is greater than 255. QEMU
> > passes a max_lun of 16383 (because it uses SAM numbering) but in Linux
> > it must become 32768 (be
Il 26/07/2012 15:28, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
> James,
>
> patch 1 fixes scanning of LUNs whose number is greater than 255. QEMU
> passes a max_lun of 16383 (because it uses SAM numbering) but in Linux
> it must become 32768 (because LUNs above 255 are "relocated" to 16640).
> Patch 2 is a resub
James,
patch 1 fixes scanning of LUNs whose number is greater than 255. QEMU
passes a max_lun of 16383 (because it uses SAM numbering) but in Linux
it must become 32768 (because LUNs above 255 are "relocated" to 16640).
Patch 2 is a resubmission of the patch for online resizing of virtio-scsi
LUN
4 matches
Mail list logo