Huang, Ying wrote:
From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The "EFI boot" patchset looks fairly unobtrusive to me. One objection:
the VIDEO_TYPE_ numbers appear split up into groups; and the EFI one
probably should be 0x70 instead of 0x24.
Should I change this and resend the patchset?
>From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>The "EFI boot" patchset looks fairly unobtrusive to me. One objection:
>the VIDEO_TYPE_ numbers appear split up into groups; and the EFI one
>probably should be 0x70 instead of 0x24.
Should I change this and resend the patchset? Or you modify it
>From: Andrew Morton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:21:41 +0800
>"Huang, Ying" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Can this patchset be merged into mainline kernel? This patchset has
been
>> in -mm tree from 2.6.23-rc2-mm2 on. Andrew Moton has suggested it to
be
>> merged into
From: Andrew Morton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:21:41 +0800
Huang, Ying [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can this patchset be merged into mainline kernel? This patchset has
been
in -mm tree from 2.6.23-rc2-mm2 on. Andrew Moton has suggested it to
be
merged into 2.6.24 during early
From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The EFI boot patchset looks fairly unobtrusive to me. One objection:
the VIDEO_TYPE_ numbers appear split up into groups; and the EFI one
probably should be 0x70 instead of 0x24.
Should I change this and resend the patchset? Or you modify it before
Huang, Ying wrote:
From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The EFI boot patchset looks fairly unobtrusive to me. One objection:
the VIDEO_TYPE_ numbers appear split up into groups; and the EFI one
probably should be 0x70 instead of 0x24.
Should I change this and resend the patchset? Or
Andrew Morton wrote:
I stopped paying attention, sorry. Have all the outstanding issues been
addressed?
The "EFI boot" patchset looks fairly unobtrusive to me. One objection:
the VIDEO_TYPE_ numbers appear split up into groups; and the EFI one
probably should be 0x70 instead of 0x24.
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:21:41 +0800
"Huang, Ying" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can this patchset be merged into mainline kernel? This patchset has been
> in -mm tree from 2.6.23-rc2-mm2 on. Andrew Moton has suggested it to be
> merged into 2.6.24 during early merge window of 2.6.24. It was not
>
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:21:41 +0800
Huang, Ying [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can this patchset be merged into mainline kernel? This patchset has been
in -mm tree from 2.6.23-rc2-mm2 on. Andrew Moton has suggested it to be
merged into 2.6.24 during early merge window of 2.6.24. It was not
merged
Andrew Morton wrote:
I stopped paying attention, sorry. Have all the outstanding issues been
addressed?
The EFI boot patchset looks fairly unobtrusive to me. One objection:
the VIDEO_TYPE_ numbers appear split up into groups; and the EFI one
probably should be 0x70 instead of 0x24.
Other
Can this patchset be merged into mainline kernel? This patchset has been
in -mm tree from 2.6.23-rc2-mm2 on. Andrew Moton has suggested it to be
merged into 2.6.24 during early merge window of 2.6.24. It was not
merged into mainline because the 32-bit boot protocol has not been done.
But now, the
Can this patchset be merged into mainline kernel? This patchset has been
in -mm tree from 2.6.23-rc2-mm2 on. Andrew Moton has suggested it to be
merged into 2.6.24 during early merge window of 2.6.24. It was not
merged into mainline because the 32-bit boot protocol has not been done.
But now, the
This patch set has been dropped because the 32-bit boot protocol is
not ready. Now, the 32-bit boot protocol has been merged, so I resend
this patch set.
Can this patch set and 32-bit boot protocol document patch catch up
with the merge window of 2.6.24?
Following sets of patches add EFI/UEFI
This patch set has been dropped because the 32-bit boot protocol is
not ready. Now, the 32-bit boot protocol has been merged, so I resend
this patch set.
Can this patch set and 32-bit boot protocol document patch catch up
with the merge window of 2.6.24?
Following sets of patches add EFI/UEFI
14 matches
Mail list logo
