On Mon 26 May 2014 01:32:08 AM CDT, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 05/24/2014 12:07 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> Quoting Nishanth Menon (2014-05-16 03:45:57)
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patch series has been carried over in vendor kernel for quiet
>>> few years now.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, it was very recently
On Mon 26 May 2014 01:32:08 AM CDT, Tero Kristo wrote:
On 05/24/2014 12:07 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Nishanth Menon (2014-05-16 03:45:57)
Hi,
This patch series has been carried over in vendor kernel for quiet
few years now.
Unfortunately, it was very recently re-discovered and
On 05/24/2014 12:07 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Nishanth Menon (2014-05-16 03:45:57)
Hi,
This patch series has been carried over in vendor kernel for quiet
few years now.
Unfortunately, it was very recently re-discovered and upstream kernel
is noticed to be broken for OMAP5 1.5GHz - at
On 05/24/2014 12:07 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Nishanth Menon (2014-05-16 03:45:57)
Hi,
This patch series has been carried over in vendor kernel for quiet
few years now.
Unfortunately, it was very recently re-discovered and upstream kernel
is noticed to be broken for OMAP5 1.5GHz - at
Quoting Nishanth Menon (2014-05-16 03:45:57)
> Hi,
>
> This patch series has been carried over in vendor kernel for quiet
> few years now.
>
> Unfortunately, it was very recently re-discovered and upstream kernel
> is noticed to be broken for OMAP5 1.5GHz - at least we are operating
> DPLL at
On 05/16/2014 01:45 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Hi,
This patch series has been carried over in vendor kernel for quiet
few years now.
Unfortunately, it was very recently re-discovered and upstream kernel
is noticed to be broken for OMAP5 1.5GHz - at least we are operating
DPLL at frequency
On 05/16/2014 01:45 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Hi,
This patch series has been carried over in vendor kernel for quiet
few years now.
Unfortunately, it was very recently re-discovered and upstream kernel
is noticed to be broken for OMAP5 1.5GHz - at least we are operating
DPLL at frequency
Quoting Nishanth Menon (2014-05-16 03:45:57)
Hi,
This patch series has been carried over in vendor kernel for quiet
few years now.
Unfortunately, it was very recently re-discovered and upstream kernel
is noticed to be broken for OMAP5 1.5GHz - at least we are operating
DPLL at frequency
Hi,
This patch series has been carried over in vendor kernel for quiet
few years now.
Unfortunately, it was very recently re-discovered and upstream kernel
is noticed to be broken for OMAP5 1.5GHz - at least we are operating
DPLL at frequency higher than what it was intended to be when CPUFreq
Hi,
This patch series has been carried over in vendor kernel for quiet
few years now.
Unfortunately, it was very recently re-discovered and upstream kernel
is noticed to be broken for OMAP5 1.5GHz - at least we are operating
DPLL at frequency higher than what it was intended to be when CPUFreq
10 matches
Mail list logo