Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: OMAP5+: Support Duty Cycle Correction(DCC)

2014-05-28 Thread Nishanth Menon
On Mon 26 May 2014 01:32:08 AM CDT, Tero Kristo wrote: > On 05/24/2014 12:07 AM, Mike Turquette wrote: >> Quoting Nishanth Menon (2014-05-16 03:45:57) >>> Hi, >>> >>> This patch series has been carried over in vendor kernel for quiet >>> few years now. >>> >>> Unfortunately, it was very recently

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: OMAP5+: Support Duty Cycle Correction(DCC)

2014-05-28 Thread Nishanth Menon
On Mon 26 May 2014 01:32:08 AM CDT, Tero Kristo wrote: On 05/24/2014 12:07 AM, Mike Turquette wrote: Quoting Nishanth Menon (2014-05-16 03:45:57) Hi, This patch series has been carried over in vendor kernel for quiet few years now. Unfortunately, it was very recently re-discovered and

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: OMAP5+: Support Duty Cycle Correction(DCC)

2014-05-26 Thread Tero Kristo
On 05/24/2014 12:07 AM, Mike Turquette wrote: Quoting Nishanth Menon (2014-05-16 03:45:57) Hi, This patch series has been carried over in vendor kernel for quiet few years now. Unfortunately, it was very recently re-discovered and upstream kernel is noticed to be broken for OMAP5 1.5GHz - at

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: OMAP5+: Support Duty Cycle Correction(DCC)

2014-05-26 Thread Tero Kristo
On 05/24/2014 12:07 AM, Mike Turquette wrote: Quoting Nishanth Menon (2014-05-16 03:45:57) Hi, This patch series has been carried over in vendor kernel for quiet few years now. Unfortunately, it was very recently re-discovered and upstream kernel is noticed to be broken for OMAP5 1.5GHz - at

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: OMAP5+: Support Duty Cycle Correction(DCC)

2014-05-23 Thread Mike Turquette
Quoting Nishanth Menon (2014-05-16 03:45:57) > Hi, > > This patch series has been carried over in vendor kernel for quiet > few years now. > > Unfortunately, it was very recently re-discovered and upstream kernel > is noticed to be broken for OMAP5 1.5GHz - at least we are operating > DPLL at

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: OMAP5+: Support Duty Cycle Correction(DCC)

2014-05-23 Thread Tero Kristo
On 05/16/2014 01:45 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: Hi, This patch series has been carried over in vendor kernel for quiet few years now. Unfortunately, it was very recently re-discovered and upstream kernel is noticed to be broken for OMAP5 1.5GHz - at least we are operating DPLL at frequency

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: OMAP5+: Support Duty Cycle Correction(DCC)

2014-05-23 Thread Tero Kristo
On 05/16/2014 01:45 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: Hi, This patch series has been carried over in vendor kernel for quiet few years now. Unfortunately, it was very recently re-discovered and upstream kernel is noticed to be broken for OMAP5 1.5GHz - at least we are operating DPLL at frequency

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: OMAP5+: Support Duty Cycle Correction(DCC)

2014-05-23 Thread Mike Turquette
Quoting Nishanth Menon (2014-05-16 03:45:57) Hi, This patch series has been carried over in vendor kernel for quiet few years now. Unfortunately, it was very recently re-discovered and upstream kernel is noticed to be broken for OMAP5 1.5GHz - at least we are operating DPLL at frequency

[PATCH 0/3] ARM: OMAP5+: Support Duty Cycle Correction(DCC)

2014-05-16 Thread Nishanth Menon
Hi, This patch series has been carried over in vendor kernel for quiet few years now. Unfortunately, it was very recently re-discovered and upstream kernel is noticed to be broken for OMAP5 1.5GHz - at least we are operating DPLL at frequency higher than what it was intended to be when CPUFreq

[PATCH 0/3] ARM: OMAP5+: Support Duty Cycle Correction(DCC)

2014-05-16 Thread Nishanth Menon
Hi, This patch series has been carried over in vendor kernel for quiet few years now. Unfortunately, it was very recently re-discovered and upstream kernel is noticed to be broken for OMAP5 1.5GHz - at least we are operating DPLL at frequency higher than what it was intended to be when CPUFreq