Re: [PATCH 0/3] Improve 32 bit vDSO time

2014-03-14 Thread Stefani Seibold
Am Donnerstag, den 13.03.2014, 15:08 -0700 schrieb H. Peter Anvin: > On 03/13/2014 01:11 AM, Stefani Seibold wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 12.03.2014, 20:48 -0700 schrieb H. Peter Anvin: > >> On 03/12/2014 04:11 PM, stef...@seibold.net wrote: > >>> > >>> I will do this when your patch is pulled into

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Improve 32 bit vDSO time

2014-03-14 Thread Stefani Seibold
Am Donnerstag, den 13.03.2014, 15:08 -0700 schrieb H. Peter Anvin: On 03/13/2014 01:11 AM, Stefani Seibold wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 12.03.2014, 20:48 -0700 schrieb H. Peter Anvin: On 03/12/2014 04:11 PM, stef...@seibold.net wrote: I will do this when your patch is pulled into tip. For now

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Improve 32 bit vDSO time

2014-03-13 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 03/13/2014 01:11 AM, Stefani Seibold wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 12.03.2014, 20:48 -0700 schrieb H. Peter Anvin: >> On 03/12/2014 04:11 PM, stef...@seibold.net wrote: >>> >>> I will do this when your patch is pulled into tip. For now we have the >>> choice, but i preferer our solution removing

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Improve 32 bit vDSO time

2014-03-13 Thread Stefani Seibold
Am Mittwoch, den 12.03.2014, 20:48 -0700 schrieb H. Peter Anvin: > On 03/12/2014 04:11 PM, stef...@seibold.net wrote: > > > > I will do this when your patch is pulled into tip. For now we have the > > choice, but i preferer our solution removing the compat vdso. > > > > Sorry, that didn't parse

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Improve 32 bit vDSO time

2014-03-13 Thread Stefani Seibold
Am Mittwoch, den 12.03.2014, 20:48 -0700 schrieb H. Peter Anvin: On 03/12/2014 04:11 PM, stef...@seibold.net wrote: I will do this when your patch is pulled into tip. For now we have the choice, but i preferer our solution removing the compat vdso. Sorry, that didn't parse from me.

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Improve 32 bit vDSO time

2014-03-13 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 03/13/2014 01:11 AM, Stefani Seibold wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 12.03.2014, 20:48 -0700 schrieb H. Peter Anvin: On 03/12/2014 04:11 PM, stef...@seibold.net wrote: I will do this when your patch is pulled into tip. For now we have the choice, but i preferer our solution removing the compat

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Improve 32 bit vDSO time

2014-03-12 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 03/12/2014 04:11 PM, stef...@seibold.net wrote: > > I will do this when your patch is pulled into tip. For now we have the > choice, but i preferer our solution removing the compat vdso. > Sorry, that didn't parse from me. Also, if you state a preference, could you please motivate it?

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Improve 32 bit vDSO time

2014-03-12 Thread stefani
Zitat von Andy Lutomirski : Since no one seems to object to the latest patch I sent out, wouldn't it make more sense to base this on top of my patch? I will do this when your patch is pulled into tip. For now we have the choice, but i preferer our solution removing the compat vdso. -

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Improve 32 bit vDSO time

2014-03-12 Thread Andy Lutomirski
Since no one seems to object to the latest patch I sent out, wouldn't it make more sense to base this on top of my patch? --Andy On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Stefani Seibold wrote: > This patch bring some improvments to the vDSO 32 bit: > > - undef some kernel configs which increase the

[PATCH 0/3] Improve 32 bit vDSO time

2014-03-12 Thread Stefani Seibold
This patch bring some improvments to the vDSO 32 bit: - undef some kernel configs which increase the code size of the VDSO - remove vsyscall and prevent wrong conditional VVAR_PAGE mapping - handle VDSO larger than a page The patch set is agains tip 7ed5ee279499a02bf35c77f0a91d657c24f6474e -- To

[PATCH 0/3] Improve 32 bit vDSO time

2014-03-12 Thread Stefani Seibold
This patch bring some improvments to the vDSO 32 bit: - undef some kernel configs which increase the code size of the VDSO - remove vsyscall and prevent wrong conditional VVAR_PAGE mapping - handle VDSO larger than a page The patch set is agains tip 7ed5ee279499a02bf35c77f0a91d657c24f6474e -- To

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Improve 32 bit vDSO time

2014-03-12 Thread Andy Lutomirski
Since no one seems to object to the latest patch I sent out, wouldn't it make more sense to base this on top of my patch? --Andy On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Stefani Seibold stef...@seibold.net wrote: This patch bring some improvments to the vDSO 32 bit: - undef some kernel configs which

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Improve 32 bit vDSO time

2014-03-12 Thread stefani
Zitat von Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net: Since no one seems to object to the latest patch I sent out, wouldn't it make more sense to base this on top of my patch? I will do this when your patch is pulled into tip. For now we have the choice, but i preferer our solution removing the

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Improve 32 bit vDSO time

2014-03-12 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 03/12/2014 04:11 PM, stef...@seibold.net wrote: I will do this when your patch is pulled into tip. For now we have the choice, but i preferer our solution removing the compat vdso. Sorry, that didn't parse from me. Also, if you state a preference, could you please motivate it?