Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpuidle: avoid module usage in non-modular code

2015-12-14 Thread Paul Gortmaker
[Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpuidle: avoid module usage in non-modular code] On 14/12/2015 (Mon 22:31) Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday, December 13, 2015 06:57:09 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > This series of commits is a part of a larger project to ensure > > people don't reference

Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpuidle: avoid module usage in non-modular code

2015-12-14 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 12/14/2015 12:57 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: This series of commits is a part of a larger project to ensure people don't reference modular support functions in non-modular code. Overall there was roughly 5k lines of dead code in the kernel due to this. So far we've fixed several areas, like

Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpuidle: avoid module usage in non-modular code

2015-12-14 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, December 13, 2015 06:57:09 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote: > This series of commits is a part of a larger project to ensure > people don't reference modular support functions in non-modular > code. Overall there was roughly 5k lines of dead code in the > kernel due to this. So far we've

Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpuidle: avoid module usage in non-modular code

2015-12-14 Thread Paul Gortmaker
[Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpuidle: avoid module usage in non-modular code] On 14/12/2015 (Mon 22:31) Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday, December 13, 2015 06:57:09 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > This series of commits is a part of a larger project to ensure > > people don't reference

Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpuidle: avoid module usage in non-modular code

2015-12-14 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, December 13, 2015 06:57:09 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote: > This series of commits is a part of a larger project to ensure > people don't reference modular support functions in non-modular > code. Overall there was roughly 5k lines of dead code in the > kernel due to this. So far we've

Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpuidle: avoid module usage in non-modular code

2015-12-14 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 12/14/2015 12:57 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: This series of commits is a part of a larger project to ensure people don't reference modular support functions in non-modular code. Overall there was roughly 5k lines of dead code in the kernel due to this. So far we've fixed several areas, like

[PATCH 0/3] cpuidle: avoid module usage in non-modular code

2015-12-13 Thread Paul Gortmaker
This series of commits is a part of a larger project to ensure people don't reference modular support functions in non-modular code. Overall there was roughly 5k lines of dead code in the kernel due to this. So far we've fixed several areas, like tty, x86, net, ... and we continue to work on

[PATCH 0/3] cpuidle: avoid module usage in non-modular code

2015-12-13 Thread Paul Gortmaker
This series of commits is a part of a larger project to ensure people don't reference modular support functions in non-modular code. Overall there was roughly 5k lines of dead code in the kernel due to this. So far we've fixed several areas, like tty, x86, net, ... and we continue to work on