From: Artem Bityutskiy
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 15:47:44 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] fs/sysv: stop using write_super and s_dirt
It does not look like sysv FS needs 'write_super()' at all, because all it
does is a timestamp update. I cannot test this patch, because this
file-system is so old and probably
From: Artem Bityutskiy artem.bityuts...@linux.intel.com
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 15:47:44 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] fs/sysv: stop using write_super and s_dirt
It does not look like sysv FS needs 'write_super()' at all, because all it
does is a timestamp update. I cannot test this patch, because this
On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 14:42 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> The issue Alan raised around the superblock timestamp is still up in
> the air. I guess he's a slow typist ;)
>
> My take is "no, we don't need to do that any more" - surely all Linux
> systems have a functional hardware clock. But
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:37:58 +0300
Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 16:43 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > This patch-set makes sysv file-system stop using the VFS '->write_supers()'
> > call-back and the '->s_dirt' superblock field because I plan to remove them
> > once all
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:37:58 +0300
Artem Bityutskiy dedeki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 16:43 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
This patch-set makes sysv file-system stop using the VFS '-write_supers()'
call-back and the '-s_dirt' superblock field because I plan to remove them
On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 14:42 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
The issue Alan raised around the superblock timestamp is still up in
the air. I guess he's a slow typist ;)
My take is no, we don't need to do that any more - surely all Linux
systems have a functional hardware clock. But the
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 17:37 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 16:43 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > This patch-set makes sysv file-system stop using the VFS '->write_supers()'
> > call-back and the '->s_dirt' superblock field because I plan to remove them
> > once all users
On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 16:43 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> This patch-set makes sysv file-system stop using the VFS '->write_supers()'
> call-back and the '->s_dirt' superblock field because I plan to remove them
> once all users are gone.
Hi Andrew,
would you please pick this patch-set as
On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 16:43 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
This patch-set makes sysv file-system stop using the VFS '-write_supers()'
call-back and the '-s_dirt' superblock field because I plan to remove them
once all users are gone.
Hi Andrew,
would you please pick this patch-set as well? I
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 17:37 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 16:43 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
This patch-set makes sysv file-system stop using the VFS '-write_supers()'
call-back and the '-s_dirt' superblock field because I plan to remove them
once all users are
10 matches
Mail list logo