Re: [PATCH 0/3] irq/core: Fix and expand the irq affinity descriptor

2018-12-28 Thread Sumit Saxena
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 6:25 PM Sumit Saxena wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 4:23 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2018, Dou Liyang wrote: > > > > > Now, Spreading the interrupt affinity info by a cpumask pointer is not > > > enough, meets a problem[1] and hard to expand in

Re: [PATCH 0/3] irq/core: Fix and expand the irq affinity descriptor

2018-12-19 Thread Sumit Saxena
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 4:23 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2018, Dou Liyang wrote: > > > Now, Spreading the interrupt affinity info by a cpumask pointer is not > > enough, meets a problem[1] and hard to expand in the future. > > > > Fix it by: > > > >

Re: [PATCH 0/3] irq/core: Fix and expand the irq affinity descriptor

2018-12-19 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018, Dou Liyang wrote: > Now, Spreading the interrupt affinity info by a cpumask pointer is not > enough, meets a problem[1] and hard to expand in the future. > > Fix it by: > > +---+ > | | > |

[PATCH 0/3] irq/core: Fix and expand the irq affinity descriptor

2018-12-04 Thread Dou Liyang
Now, Spreading the interrupt affinity info by a cpumask pointer is not enough, meets a problem[1] and hard to expand in the future. Fix it by: +---+ | | | struct cpumask *affinity | |

[PATCH 0/3] irq/core: Fix and expand the irq affinity descriptor

2018-12-04 Thread Dou Liyang
Now, Spreading the interrupt affinity info by a cpumask pointer is not enough, meets a problem[1] and hard to expand in the future. Fix it by: +---+ | | | struct cpumask *affinity | |