Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Resolve MSI vs. INTX_DISABLE quirks, V2.

2007-10-25 Thread David Miller
From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:32:48 -0700 > These all look great to me, and I've pulled them into my trees. > > Thanks a lot for doing this work. Thanks for integrating. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a

Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Resolve MSI vs. INTX_DISABLE quirks, V2.

2007-10-25 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 01:14:45AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > Ok, I've respun the patches including all of the feedback I've > obtained. Again, it's at: > > kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/msiquirk-2.6.git > > Greg, I think this stuff is ready to go so if you would pull >

[PATCH 0/4]: Resolve MSI vs. INTX_DISABLE quirks, V2.

2007-10-25 Thread David Miller
Ok, I've respun the patches including all of the feedback I've obtained. Again, it's at: kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/msiquirk-2.6.git Greg, I think this stuff is ready to go so if you would pull them in I would really appreciate it. These changes clean up the handling

[PATCH 0/4]: Resolve MSI vs. INTX_DISABLE quirks, V2.

2007-10-25 Thread David Miller
Ok, I've respun the patches including all of the feedback I've obtained. Again, it's at: kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/msiquirk-2.6.git Greg, I think this stuff is ready to go so if you would pull them in I would really appreciate it. These changes clean up the handling

Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Resolve MSI vs. INTX_DISABLE quirks, V2.

2007-10-25 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 01:14:45AM -0700, David Miller wrote: Ok, I've respun the patches including all of the feedback I've obtained. Again, it's at: kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/msiquirk-2.6.git Greg, I think this stuff is ready to go so if you would pull them in

Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Resolve MSI vs. INTX_DISABLE quirks, V2.

2007-10-25 Thread David Miller
From: Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:32:48 -0700 These all look great to me, and I've pulled them into my trees. Thanks a lot for doing this work. Thanks for integrating. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to

Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Resolve MSI vs. INTX_DISABLE quirks.

2007-10-24 Thread Jeff Garzik
David Miller wrote: The forthcoming patches are also available from: kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/msiquirk-2.6.git and clean up the handling of the common quirk wherein setting INTX_DISABLE will mistakedly disable MSI generation for some devices. For devices without that

Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Resolve MSI vs. INTX_DISABLE quirks.

2007-10-24 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, David Miller wrote: > From: Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:58:45 -0400 (EDT) > > > I'm not sure all of the pci_intx() calls in msi.c should be skipped when > > the quirk applies; I think some of them might be there so that the legacy > >

Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Resolve MSI vs. INTX_DISABLE quirks.

2007-10-24 Thread Jeff Garzik
David Miller wrote: The forthcoming patches are also available from: kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/msiquirk-2.6.git and clean up the handling of the common quirk wherein setting INTX_DISABLE will mistakedly disable MSI generation for some devices. For devices without that

Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Resolve MSI vs. INTX_DISABLE quirks.

2007-10-24 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, David Miller wrote: From: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:58:45 -0400 (EDT) I'm not sure all of the pci_intx() calls in msi.c should be skipped when the quirk applies; I think some of them might be there so that the legacy interrupt

Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Resolve MSI vs. INTX_DISABLE quirks.

2007-10-23 Thread David Miller
From: Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:58:45 -0400 (EDT) > I'm not sure all of the pci_intx() calls in msi.c should be skipped when > the quirk applies; I think some of them might be there so that the legacy > interrupt won't be delivered while MSI is turned off

Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Resolve MSI vs. INTX_DISABLE quirks.

2007-10-23 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, David Miller wrote: > > The forthcoming patches are also available from: > > kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/msiquirk-2.6.git > > and clean up the handling of the common quirk wherein setting > INTX_DISABLE will mistakedly disable MSI generation for some >

[PATCH 0/4]: Resolve MSI vs. INTX_DISABLE quirks.

2007-10-23 Thread David Miller
The forthcoming patches are also available from: kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/msiquirk-2.6.git and clean up the handling of the common quirk wherein setting INTX_DISABLE will mistakedly disable MSI generation for some devices. For devices without that problem, we want to

[PATCH 0/4]: Resolve MSI vs. INTX_DISABLE quirks.

2007-10-23 Thread David Miller
The forthcoming patches are also available from: kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/msiquirk-2.6.git and clean up the handling of the common quirk wherein setting INTX_DISABLE will mistakedly disable MSI generation for some devices. For devices without that problem, we want to

Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Resolve MSI vs. INTX_DISABLE quirks.

2007-10-23 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, David Miller wrote: The forthcoming patches are also available from: kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/msiquirk-2.6.git and clean up the handling of the common quirk wherein setting INTX_DISABLE will mistakedly disable MSI generation for some

Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Resolve MSI vs. INTX_DISABLE quirks.

2007-10-23 Thread David Miller
From: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:58:45 -0400 (EDT) I'm not sure all of the pci_intx() calls in msi.c should be skipped when the quirk applies; I think some of them might be there so that the legacy interrupt won't be delivered while MSI is turned off (since