On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 10:14:26AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Would you be willing to fold in the description in the patch #4 and repost it?
>
> Andrew - are you OK picking it up or would you prefer me as the maintainer
> to feed it to Linus? [either option is fine with me]
AFAICS
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 07:46:36PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 04:22:30PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 01:34:06PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:12:22AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 07:46:36PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 04:22:30PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 01:34:06PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:12:22AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Thank you for
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 10:14:26AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Would you be willing to fold in the description in the patch #4 and repost it?
Andrew - are you OK picking it up or would you prefer me as the maintainer
to feed it to Linus? [either option is fine with me]
AFAICS Andrew
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 04:22:30PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 01:34:06PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:12:22AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > Thank you for posting these patches. I was wondering if you had
> > > run
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 04:22:30PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 01:34:06PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:12:22AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Thank you for posting these patches. I was wondering if you had
run through some
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 01:34:06PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:12:22AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > Thank you for posting these patches. I was wondering if you had
> > run through some of the different combinations that you can
> > load the
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 01:34:06PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:12:22AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Thank you for posting these patches. I was wondering if you had
run through some of the different combinations that you can
load the filesystems/tmem
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:12:22AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Thank you for posting these patches. I was wondering if you had
> run through some of the different combinations that you can
> load the filesystems/tmem drivers in random order? The #4 patch
> deleted a nice chunk of
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:12:22AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Thank you for posting these patches. I was wondering if you had
run through some of the different combinations that you can
load the filesystems/tmem drivers in random order? The #4 patch
deleted a nice chunk of
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 09:31:51PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently, maximal number of cleancache enabled filesystems equals 32,
> which is insufficient nowadays, because a Linux host can have hundreds
> of containers on board, each of which might want its own filesystem.
> This
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 09:31:51PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
Hi,
Currently, maximal number of cleancache enabled filesystems equals 32,
which is insufficient nowadays, because a Linux host can have hundreds
of containers on board, each of which might want its own filesystem.
This patch
Hi,
Currently, maximal number of cleancache enabled filesystems equals 32,
which is insufficient nowadays, because a Linux host can have hundreds
of containers on board, each of which might want its own filesystem.
This patch set targets at removing this limitation - see patch 4 for
more details.
Hi,
Currently, maximal number of cleancache enabled filesystems equals 32,
which is insufficient nowadays, because a Linux host can have hundreds
of containers on board, each of which might want its own filesystem.
This patch set targets at removing this limitation - see patch 4 for
more details.
14 matches
Mail list logo
