nd heavily modified so the previous versioning was dropped.
>>> >
>>> > The cover letter of part #1 ("[PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq
>>> > drivers for Exynos4210 platform") contains detailed changelog on what has
>>> > been chang
ed changelog on what has
>> > been changed since Thomas' original v12 patch series. Individual Thomas'
>> > patches which were modified by me also contain such information.
>> >
>> > Part #2 ("[PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x
changelog.
However for part #3 (this one, [PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq
drivers for Exynos5250 platform) such summary changelog got missed for
some reason. Here it is:
- split Exynos5250 support from the original patch
- moved E5250_CPU_DIV[0,1]() macros to clk-exynos5250.c
such detailed changelog as part #1.
The newly posted part #4 ([PATCH 0/8] cpufreq: add generic cpufreq driver
support for Exynos5250/5800 platforms https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/21/314)
also contains the detailed changelog.
However for part #3 (this one, [PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq
ous versioning was dropped.
> >> >
> >> > The cover letter of part #1 ("[PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq
> >> > drivers for Exynos4210 platform") contains detailed changelog on what has
> >> > been changed since Thomas' original v12 pa
.
However for part #3 (this one, [PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq
drivers for Exynos5250 platform) such summary changelog got missed for
some reason. Here it is:
- split Exynos5250 support from the original patch
- moved E5250_CPU_DIV[0,1]() macros to clk-exynos5250.c
- added CPU
> The cover letter of part #1 ("[PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq
>> > drivers for Exynos4210 platform") contains detailed changelog on what has
>> > been changed since Thomas' original v12 patch series. Individual Thomas'
>> > patches which were
://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/21/314)
also contains the detailed changelog.
However for part #3 (this one, [PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq
drivers for Exynos5250 platform) such summary changelog got missed for
some reason. Here it is:
- split Exynos5250 support from the original patch
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz writes:
[...]
>> However, with the default governor set to userspace it boots fine until
>> my userspace (ubuntu) tries to enable the ondemand governor, and then it
>> hangs.
>>
>> For it to boot, I have to disable the ondemand governor, and set the
>> default
eq drivers for Exynos4x12
> > platform") was entirely new code when compared to Thomas' v12 patchset so
> > its cover letter doesn't contain such detailed changelog as part #1.
> >
> > The newly posted part #4 ("[PATCH 0/8] cpufreq: add generic cpufreq driver
: add generic cpufreq driver
support for Exynos5250/5800 platforms https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/21/314)
also contains the detailed changelog.
However for part #3 (this one, [PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq
drivers for Exynos5250 platform) such summary changelog got missed for
some
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz b.zolnier...@samsung.com writes:
[...]
However, with the default governor set to userspace it boots fine until
my userspace (ubuntu) tries to enable the ondemand governor, and then it
hangs.
For it to boot, I have to disable the ondemand governor, and set the
eric cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12
> platform") was entirely new code when compared to Thomas' v12 patchset so
> its cover letter doesn't contain such detailed changelog as part #1.
>
> The newly posted part #4 ("[PATCH 0/8] cpufreq: add generic cpufreq driver
> support for
eq: add generic cpufreq driver
support for Exynos5250/5800 platforms" https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/21/314)
also contains the detailed changelog.
However for part #3 (this one, "[PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq
drivers for Exynos5250 platform") such summary changelog got mi
letter doesn't contain such detailed changelog as part #1.
The newly posted part #4 ([PATCH 0/8] cpufreq: add generic cpufreq driver
support for Exynos5250/5800 platforms https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/21/314)
also contains the detailed changelog.
However for part #3 (this one, [PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: use
contains the detailed changelog.
However for part #3 (this one, [PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq
drivers for Exynos5250 platform) such summary changelog got missed for
some reason. Here it is:
- split Exynos5250 support from the original patch
- moved E5250_CPU_DIV[0,1]() macros to clk
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz writes:
> Hi,
>
> This patch series removes the use of Exynos5250 specific support
> from exynos-cpufreq driver and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver
> for this platform. The exynos-cpufreq driver itself is also removed
> as it is no longer used/needed after
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz b.zolnier...@samsung.com writes:
Hi,
This patch series removes the use of Exynos5250 specific support
from exynos-cpufreq driver and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver
for this platform. The exynos-cpufreq driver itself is also removed
as it is no longer
Hi,
This patch series removes the use of Exynos5250 specific support
from exynos-cpufreq driver and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver
for this platform. The exynos-cpufreq driver itself is also removed
as it is no longer used/needed after Exynos5250 support removal.
This patch series has
Hi,
This patch series removes the use of Exynos5250 specific support
from exynos-cpufreq driver and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver
for this platform. The exynos-cpufreq driver itself is also removed
as it is no longer used/needed after Exynos5250 support removal.
This patch series has
20 matches
Mail list logo
