On May 17, 2019 9:13:26 AM GMT+02:00, David Howells wrote:
>Christian Brauner wrote:
>
>> If you still prefer to have cloexec flags
>> for the 4 new syscalls then yes,
>> if they could at least all have the same name
>> (FSMOUNT_CLOEXEC?) that would be good.
>
>They don't all have the same value
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 9:13 AM David Howells wrote:
>
> Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> > If you still prefer to have cloexec flags
> > for the 4 new syscalls then yes,
> > if they could at least all have the same name
> > (FSMOUNT_CLOEXEC?) that would be good.
>
> They don't all have the same
Christian Brauner wrote:
> If you still prefer to have cloexec flags
> for the 4 new syscalls then yes,
> if they could at least all have the same name
> (FSMOUNT_CLOEXEC?) that would be good.
They don't all have the same value (see OPEN_TREE_CLOEXEC).
Note that I also don't want to blindly
On May 16, 2019 6:50:22 PM GMT+02:00, Al Viro wrote:
>[linux-abi cc'd]
>
>On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 06:31:52PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
>> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 05:22:59PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:52:04PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi Linus, Al,
On May 16, 2019 10:23:31 PM GMT+02:00, "Dmitry V. Levin"
wrote:
>[looks like linux-abi is a typo, Cc'ed linux-api instead]
>
>On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 05:50:22PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>> [linux-abi cc'd]
>>
>> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 06:31:52PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
>> > On Thu, May
[looks like linux-abi is a typo, Cc'ed linux-api instead]
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 05:50:22PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> [linux-abi cc'd]
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 06:31:52PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 05:22:59PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at
> unshare(CLONE_FILES);
> /* we don't want anything past stderr here */
> close_range(3, ~0U);
> execve();
Yes please.
nextfd(2)
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/1/71
fdmap(2)
https://marc.info/?t=15062836696=1=4
I like fdmap more.
On May 16, 2019 6:50:22 PM GMT+02:00, Al Viro wrote:
>[linux-abi cc'd]
>
>On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 06:31:52PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
>> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 05:22:59PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:52:04PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi Linus, Al,
[linux-abi cc'd]
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 06:31:52PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 05:22:59PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:52:04PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Linus, Al,
> > >
> > > Here are some patches that make changes to the
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 05:22:59PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:52:04PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> >
> > Hi Linus, Al,
> >
> > Here are some patches that make changes to the mount API UAPI and two of
> > them really need applying, before -rc1 - if they're going to be
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 05:22:59PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:52:04PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> >
> > Hi Linus, Al,
> >
> > Here are some patches that make changes to the mount API UAPI and two of
> > them really need applying, before -rc1 - if they're going to be
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:52:04PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
>
> Hi Linus, Al,
>
> Here are some patches that make changes to the mount API UAPI and two of
> them really need applying, before -rc1 - if they're going to be applied at
> all.
I'm fine with 2--4, but I'm not convinced that
Hi Linus, Al,
Here are some patches that make changes to the mount API UAPI and two of
them really need applying, before -rc1 - if they're going to be applied at
all.
The following changes are made:
(1) Make the file descriptors returned by open_tree(), fsopen(), fspick()
and fsmount()
13 matches
Mail list logo
