On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Who can review this? And where should I send FPU changes?
>
> And it seems that nobody cares about 2 fixes I sent before.
> Linus, I understand that you won't take them into v3.17, but
> perhaps you can ack/nack them explicitly?
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Oleg Nesterov o...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
Who can review this? And where should I send FPU changes?
And it seems that nobody cares about 2 fixes I sent before.
Linus, I understand that you won't take them into v3.17, but
perhaps you can ack/nack them
On 08/28, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> > Oleg, this is unacceptable.
> >
> > Last week was Kernel Summit and that was right on the heels of
> > a merge window. We are backlogged like crazy and being rude
> > doesn't help one iota.
>
> Also, the previous set of patches was
On 08/27, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > Who can review this? And where should I send FPU changes?
>
> FWIW, I have nothing against this series (or, indeed, the last series
> with the exception of 2/5 that got replaced by just the
On 08/27, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> Oleg, this is unacceptable.
>
> Last week was Kernel Summit and that was right on the heels
> of a merge window. We are backlogged like crazy and being
> rude doesn't help one iota.
Me? Rude??
I really hope that this is the first (and last) email from me
* H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Oleg, this is unacceptable.
>
> Last week was Kernel Summit and that was right on the heels of
> a merge window. We are backlogged like crazy and being rude
> doesn't help one iota.
Also, the previous set of patches was under active review by
Linus with
* H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
Oleg, this is unacceptable.
Last week was Kernel Summit and that was right on the heels of
a merge window. We are backlogged like crazy and being rude
doesn't help one iota.
Also, the previous set of patches was under active review by
Linus with
On 08/27, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Oleg, this is unacceptable.
Last week was Kernel Summit and that was right on the heels
of a merge window. We are backlogged like crazy and being
rude doesn't help one iota.
Me? Rude??
I really hope that this is the first (and last) email from me which
can
On 08/27, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Oleg Nesterov o...@redhat.com wrote:
Who can review this? And where should I send FPU changes?
FWIW, I have nothing against this series (or, indeed, the last series
with the exception of 2/5 that got replaced by just the
On 08/28, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
Oleg, this is unacceptable.
Last week was Kernel Summit and that was right on the heels of
a merge window. We are backlogged like crazy and being rude
doesn't help one iota.
Also, the previous set of patches was
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Who can review this? And where should I send FPU changes?
FWIW, I have nothing against this series (or, indeed, the last series
with the exception of 2/5 that got replaced by just the preemption
disable).
Although with the whole i387
Oleg, this is unacceptable.
Last week was Kernel Summit and that was right on the heels of a merge window.
We are backlogged like crazy and being rude doesn't help one iota.
On August 27, 2014 11:51:38 AM PDT, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Who can review this? And where should I send FPU
Hello,
Who can review this? And where should I send FPU changes?
And it seems that nobody cares about 2 fixes I sent before.
Linus, I understand that you won't take them into v3.17, but
perhaps you can ack/nack them explicitly? It seems that nobody
can do this.
Oleg.
Hello,
Who can review this? And where should I send FPU changes?
And it seems that nobody cares about 2 fixes I sent before.
Linus, I understand that you won't take them into v3.17, but
perhaps you can ack/nack them explicitly? It seems that nobody
can do this.
Oleg.
Oleg, this is unacceptable.
Last week was Kernel Summit and that was right on the heels of a merge window.
We are backlogged like crazy and being rude doesn't help one iota.
On August 27, 2014 11:51:38 AM PDT, Oleg Nesterov o...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
Who can review this? And where should I
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Oleg Nesterov o...@redhat.com wrote:
Who can review this? And where should I send FPU changes?
FWIW, I have nothing against this series (or, indeed, the last series
with the exception of 2/5 that got replaced by just the preemption
disable).
Although with the
16 matches
Mail list logo
