Re: [PATCH 0/5] Call netif_carrier_off() after register_netdev()

2012-08-17 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:55:43 +0400 Ilya Shchepetkov wrote: > >> Ben Hutchings writes: > >>> But if you do it beforehand then it doesn't have the intended effect. > >>> (Supposed to be fixed by 22604c866889c4b2e12b73cbf1683bda1b72a313, which > >>> had to be reverted:

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Call netif_carrier_off() after register_netdev()

2012-08-17 Thread Ilya Shchepetkov
>> Ben Hutchings writes: >>> But if you do it beforehand then it doesn't have the intended effect. >>> (Supposed to be fixed by 22604c866889c4b2e12b73cbf1683bda1b72a313, which >>> had to be reverted: c276e098d3ee33059b4a1c747354226cec58487c.) >>> >>> So you have to do it after, but without

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Call netif_carrier_off() after register_netdev()

2012-08-17 Thread Ilya Shchepetkov
Ben Hutchings bhutchi...@solarflare.com writes: But if you do it beforehand then it doesn't have the intended effect. (Supposed to be fixed by 22604c866889c4b2e12b73cbf1683bda1b72a313, which had to be reverted: c276e098d3ee33059b4a1c747354226cec58487c.) So you have to do it after, but

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Call netif_carrier_off() after register_netdev()

2012-08-17 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:55:43 +0400 Ilya Shchepetkov shchepet...@ispras.ru wrote: Ben Hutchings bhutchi...@solarflare.com writes: But if you do it beforehand then it doesn't have the intended effect. (Supposed to be fixed by 22604c866889c4b2e12b73cbf1683bda1b72a313, which had to be

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Call netif_carrier_off() after register_netdev()

2012-08-15 Thread Bjørn Mork
Ben Hutchings writes: > But if you do it beforehand then it doesn't have the intended effect. > (Supposed to be fixed by 22604c866889c4b2e12b73cbf1683bda1b72a313, which > had to be reverted: c276e098d3ee33059b4a1c747354226cec58487c.) > > So you have to do it after, but without dropping the RTNL

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Call netif_carrier_off() after register_netdev()

2012-08-15 Thread Bjørn Mork
Ben Hutchings bhutchi...@solarflare.com writes: But if you do it beforehand then it doesn't have the intended effect. (Supposed to be fixed by 22604c866889c4b2e12b73cbf1683bda1b72a313, which had to be reverted: c276e098d3ee33059b4a1c747354226cec58487c.) So you have to do it after, but

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Call netif_carrier_off() after register_netdev()

2012-08-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 14:00 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Ilya Shchepetkov > Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:28:50 +0400 > > > Hi, > > > > There are several patches on the subject: > > > > 31bde1ceaa873bcaecd49e829bfabceacc4c512d > > c55ad8e56b983f03589b38b4504b5d1f41161ff8 > >

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Call netif_carrier_off() after register_netdev()

2012-08-14 Thread David Miller
From: Ilya Shchepetkov Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:28:50 +0400 > Hi, > > There are several patches on the subject: > > 31bde1ceaa873bcaecd49e829bfabceacc4c512d > c55ad8e56b983f03589b38b4504b5d1f41161ff8 > e826eafa65c6f1f7c8db5a237556cebac57ebcc5 >

[PATCH 0/5] Call netif_carrier_off() after register_netdev()

2012-08-14 Thread Ilya Shchepetkov
Hi, There are several patches on the subject: 31bde1ceaa873bcaecd49e829bfabceacc4c512d c55ad8e56b983f03589b38b4504b5d1f41161ff8 e826eafa65c6f1f7c8db5a237556cebac57ebcc5 0d672e9f8ac320c6d1ea9103db6df7f99ea20361

[PATCH 0/5] Call netif_carrier_off() after register_netdev()

2012-08-14 Thread Ilya Shchepetkov
Hi, There are several patches on the subject: 31bde1ceaa873bcaecd49e829bfabceacc4c512d c55ad8e56b983f03589b38b4504b5d1f41161ff8 e826eafa65c6f1f7c8db5a237556cebac57ebcc5 0d672e9f8ac320c6d1ea9103db6df7f99ea20361

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Call netif_carrier_off() after register_netdev()

2012-08-14 Thread David Miller
From: Ilya Shchepetkov shchepet...@ispras.ru Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:28:50 +0400 Hi, There are several patches on the subject: 31bde1ceaa873bcaecd49e829bfabceacc4c512d c55ad8e56b983f03589b38b4504b5d1f41161ff8 e826eafa65c6f1f7c8db5a237556cebac57ebcc5

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Call netif_carrier_off() after register_netdev()

2012-08-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 14:00 -0700, David Miller wrote: From: Ilya Shchepetkov shchepet...@ispras.ru Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:28:50 +0400 Hi, There are several patches on the subject: 31bde1ceaa873bcaecd49e829bfabceacc4c512d c55ad8e56b983f03589b38b4504b5d1f41161ff8