On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 13:23:30 +0530
Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday 07 February 2017 08:25 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 16:41:38 +0530
> > Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> >
> >> The v5 patchset for sdt
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 13:23:30 +0530
Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday 07 February 2017 08:25 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 16:41:38 +0530
> > Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> >
> >> The v5 patchset for sdt marker argument support for x86 [1] has
> >> couple of issues. For
On Tuesday 07 February 2017 08:25 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 16:41:38 +0530
> Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>
>> The v5 patchset for sdt marker argument support for x86 [1] has
>> couple of issues. For example, it still has x86 specific code
>>
On Tuesday 07 February 2017 08:25 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 16:41:38 +0530
> Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>
>> The v5 patchset for sdt marker argument support for x86 [1] has
>> couple of issues. For example, it still has x86 specific code
>> in general code. It lacks support
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 16:41:38 +0530
Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> The v5 patchset for sdt marker argument support for x86 [1] has
> couple of issues. For example, it still has x86 specific code
> in general code. It lacks support for rNN (with size postfix
> b/w/d),
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 16:41:38 +0530
Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> The v5 patchset for sdt marker argument support for x86 [1] has
> couple of issues. For example, it still has x86 specific code
> in general code. It lacks support for rNN (with size postfix
> b/w/d), %rsp, %esp, %sil etc. registers and
The v5 patchset for sdt marker argument support for x86 [1] has
couple of issues. For example, it still has x86 specific code
in general code. It lacks support for rNN (with size postfix
b/w/d), %rsp, %esp, %sil etc. registers and such sdt markers
are failing at 'perf probe'. It also fails to
The v5 patchset for sdt marker argument support for x86 [1] has
couple of issues. For example, it still has x86 specific code
in general code. It lacks support for rNN (with size postfix
b/w/d), %rsp, %esp, %sil etc. registers and such sdt markers
are failing at 'perf probe'. It also fails to
8 matches
Mail list logo