On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 03:37:44PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for your fast reply! I guess these patches will go through
> > the DT tree, or should I carry them in the IOMMU tree? The DT tree
> > probably
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 03:37:44PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for your fast reply! I guess these patches will go through
> > the DT tree, or should I carry them in the IOMMU tree? The DT tree
> > probably makes more sense.
>
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 01:45:41PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>> > Please review. Patches are based on v4.5.
>>
>> Other than my one
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 01:45:41PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>> > Please review. Patches are based on v4.5.
>>
>> Other than my one comment, this looks good to me. For the
Hi Rob,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 01:45:41PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > Please review. Patches are based on v4.5.
>
> Other than my one comment, this looks good to me. For the series:
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring
Hi Rob,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 01:45:41PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > Please review. Patches are based on v4.5.
>
> Other than my one comment, this looks good to me. For the series:
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring
Thanks a lot for your
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is an implementation of the iterator over phandles
> concept which Rob Herring suggested to me some time ago. My
> approach is a little bit different from what the diff showed
> back then, but it gets rid of the
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is an implementation of the iterator over phandles
> concept which Rob Herring suggested to me some time ago. My
> approach is a little bit different from what the diff showed
> back then, but it gets rid of the allocation and
Hi,
here is an implementation of the iterator over phandles
concept which Rob Herring suggested to me some time ago. My
approach is a little bit different from what the diff showed
back then, but it gets rid of the allocation and 'struct
'struct of_phandle_args' misuse.
I also converted the
Hi,
here is an implementation of the iterator over phandles
concept which Rob Herring suggested to me some time ago. My
approach is a little bit different from what the diff showed
back then, but it gets rid of the allocation and 'struct
'struct of_phandle_args' misuse.
I also converted the
10 matches
Mail list logo