Re: [PATCH 0/6] of: Implement iterator for phandles

2016-04-04 Thread Joerg Roedel
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 03:37:44PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > Thanks a lot for your fast reply! I guess these patches will go through > > the DT tree, or should I carry them in the IOMMU tree? The DT tree > > probably

Re: [PATCH 0/6] of: Implement iterator for phandles

2016-04-04 Thread Joerg Roedel
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 03:37:44PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > Thanks a lot for your fast reply! I guess these patches will go through > > the DT tree, or should I carry them in the IOMMU tree? The DT tree > > probably makes more sense. >

Re: [PATCH 0/6] of: Implement iterator for phandles

2016-03-23 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 01:45:41PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: >> > Please review. Patches are based on v4.5. >> >> Other than my one

Re: [PATCH 0/6] of: Implement iterator for phandles

2016-03-23 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 01:45:41PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: >> > Please review. Patches are based on v4.5. >> >> Other than my one comment, this looks good to me. For the

Re: [PATCH 0/6] of: Implement iterator for phandles

2016-03-23 Thread Joerg Roedel
Hi Rob, On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 01:45:41PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > Please review. Patches are based on v4.5. > > Other than my one comment, this looks good to me. For the series: > > Acked-by: Rob Herring

Re: [PATCH 0/6] of: Implement iterator for phandles

2016-03-23 Thread Joerg Roedel
Hi Rob, On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 01:45:41PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > Please review. Patches are based on v4.5. > > Other than my one comment, this looks good to me. For the series: > > Acked-by: Rob Herring Thanks a lot for your

Re: [PATCH 0/6] of: Implement iterator for phandles

2016-03-22 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > Hi, > > here is an implementation of the iterator over phandles > concept which Rob Herring suggested to me some time ago. My > approach is a little bit different from what the diff showed > back then, but it gets rid of the

Re: [PATCH 0/6] of: Implement iterator for phandles

2016-03-22 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > Hi, > > here is an implementation of the iterator over phandles > concept which Rob Herring suggested to me some time ago. My > approach is a little bit different from what the diff showed > back then, but it gets rid of the allocation and

[PATCH 0/6] of: Implement iterator for phandles

2016-03-22 Thread Joerg Roedel
Hi, here is an implementation of the iterator over phandles concept which Rob Herring suggested to me some time ago. My approach is a little bit different from what the diff showed back then, but it gets rid of the allocation and 'struct 'struct of_phandle_args' misuse. I also converted the

[PATCH 0/6] of: Implement iterator for phandles

2016-03-22 Thread Joerg Roedel
Hi, here is an implementation of the iterator over phandles concept which Rob Herring suggested to me some time ago. My approach is a little bit different from what the diff showed back then, but it gets rid of the allocation and 'struct 'struct of_phandle_args' misuse. I also converted the