On 4/23/07, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Paul,
In [patch 3/7] Containers (V8): Add generic multi-subsystem API to
containers, you have forcefully enabled interrupt in
container_init_subsys() with spin_unlock_irq() which breaks on PPC64.
> +static void
On 4/23/07, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Paul,
In [patch 3/7] Containers (V8): Add generic multi-subsystem API to
containers, you have forcefully enabled interrupt in
container_init_subsys() with spin_unlock_irq() which breaks on PPC64.
+static void
Hi Paul,
In [patch 3/7] Containers (V8): Add generic multi-subsystem API to
containers, you have forcefully enabled interrupt in
container_init_subsys() with spin_unlock_irq() which breaks on PPC64.
> +static void container_init_subsys(struct container_subsys *ss) {
> + int retval;
> +
Hi Paul,
In [patch 3/7] Containers (V8): Add generic multi-subsystem API to
containers, you have forcefully enabled interrupt in
container_init_subsys() with spin_unlock_irq() which breaks on PPC64.
+static void container_init_subsys(struct container_subsys *ss) {
+ int retval;
+
--
This is an update to my multi-hierarchy multi-subsystem generic
process containers patch. Changes since V7 (12th Feb) include:
- Removed the config-time choice of the number of supported
hierarchies - this is now completely dynamic; new hierarchies are
allocated on demand, and freed when no
--
This is an update to my multi-hierarchy multi-subsystem generic
process containers patch. Changes since V7 (12th Feb) include:
- Removed the config-time choice of the number of supported
hierarchies - this is now completely dynamic; new hierarchies are
allocated on demand, and freed when no
6 matches
Mail list logo