Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: arm/arm64: gsi routing support

2015-07-05 Thread Christoffer Dall
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 05:37:10PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote: > With the advent of GICv3 ITS in-kernel emulation, KVM GSI routing > appears to be requested. More specifically MSI routing is needed. > irqchip routing does not sound to be really useful on arm but usage of > MSI routing also mandates

Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: arm/arm64: gsi routing support

2015-07-05 Thread Christoffer Dall
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 05:37:10PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote: With the advent of GICv3 ITS in-kernel emulation, KVM GSI routing appears to be requested. More specifically MSI routing is needed. irqchip routing does not sound to be really useful on arm but usage of MSI routing also mandates to

[PATCH 0/7] KVM: arm/arm64: gsi routing support

2015-06-29 Thread Eric Auger
With the advent of GICv3 ITS in-kernel emulation, KVM GSI routing appears to be requested. More specifically MSI routing is needed. irqchip routing does not sound to be really useful on arm but usage of MSI routing also mandates to integrate irqchip routing. The initial implementation of irqfd on

[PATCH 0/7] KVM: arm/arm64: gsi routing support

2015-06-29 Thread Eric Auger
With the advent of GICv3 ITS in-kernel emulation, KVM GSI routing appears to be requested. More specifically MSI routing is needed. irqchip routing does not sound to be really useful on arm but usage of MSI routing also mandates to integrate irqchip routing. The initial implementation of irqfd on