Hi,
On 02/28/2018 07:46 AM, Gaku Inami wrote:
> Hi
>
[...]
>
> Tested-by: Gaku Inami
>
> I tested as same in other SoC. It looks fine.
>
Thanks for testing on your side !
Hi,
On 02/28/2018 07:46 AM, Gaku Inami wrote:
> Hi
>
[...]
>
> Tested-by: Gaku Inami
>
> I tested as same in other SoC. It looks fine.
>
Thanks for testing on your side !
r.eggem...@arm.com;
> vincent.guit...@linaro.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmus...@arm.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 0/7] sched/fair: Migrate 'misfit' tasks on asymmetric
> capacity systems
>
>
> The patches have been tested on:
>
r.eggem...@arm.com;
> vincent.guit...@linaro.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> Morten Rasmussen
> Subject: [PATCH 0/7] sched/fair: Migrate 'misfit' tasks on asymmetric
> capacity systems
>
>
> The patches have been tested on:
>1. Arm Juno (r0): 2+4 Cortex A5
On asymmetric cpu capacity systems (e.g. Arm big.LITTLE) it is crucial
for performance that cpu intensive tasks are aggressively migrated to
high capacity cpus as soon as those become available. The capacity
awareness tweaks already in the wake-up path can't handle this as such
tasks might run or
On asymmetric cpu capacity systems (e.g. Arm big.LITTLE) it is crucial
for performance that cpu intensive tasks are aggressively migrated to
high capacity cpus as soon as those become available. The capacity
awareness tweaks already in the wake-up path can't handle this as such
tasks might run or
6 matches
Mail list logo