On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 02:39:36PM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
>
> On 1/11/21 12:28 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> > Tom,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:46:03AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> >
> > [..]
> >> I have been doing the first review in a couple of days after every patch
> >> landing.
> > I
On 1/11/21 12:28 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> Tom,
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:46:03AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
>
> [..]
>> I have been doing the first review in a couple of days after every patch
>> landing.
> I appreciate your help with doing reviews.
>
>> I see some pretty good response
Tom,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:46:03AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
[..]
> I have been doing the first review in a couple of days after every patch
> landing.
I appreciate your help with doing reviews.
> I see some pretty good response from the developers to fix the issues raised.
... yet
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:46:03AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
>
> On 1/11/21 10:21 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 08:43:15AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> >> On 1/11/21 8:09 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 07:55:24AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> On 1/11/21 6:54 AM, Greg KH
On 1/11/21 10:21 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 08:43:15AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
>> On 1/11/21 8:09 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 07:55:24AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
On 1/11/21 6:54 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 06:40:24AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 08:43:15AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
>
> On 1/11/21 8:09 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 07:55:24AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> >> On 1/11/21 6:54 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 06:40:24AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> On 1/10/21 10:57 PM, Greg KH
On 1/11/21 8:09 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 07:55:24AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
>> On 1/11/21 6:54 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 06:40:24AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
On 1/10/21 10:57 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 11:43:54AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 07:55:24AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
>
> On 1/11/21 6:54 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 06:40:24AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> >> On 1/10/21 10:57 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 11:43:54AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> On 1/10/21 9:05 AM, Moritz
On 1/11/21 6:54 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 06:40:24AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
>> On 1/10/21 10:57 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 11:43:54AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
On 1/10/21 9:05 AM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> Tom,
>
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 06:40:24AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
>
> On 1/10/21 10:57 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 11:43:54AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> >> On 1/10/21 9:05 AM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> >>> Tom,
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 07:46:29AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> On
On 1/10/21 10:57 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 11:43:54AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
>> On 1/10/21 9:05 AM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
>>> Tom,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 07:46:29AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
On 1/7/21 8:09 AM, Tom Rix wrote:
> On 1/6/21 8:37 PM, Moritz Fischer
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 11:43:54AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
>
> On 1/10/21 9:05 AM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> > Tom,
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 07:46:29AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> >> On 1/7/21 8:09 AM, Tom Rix wrote:
> >>> On 1/6/21 8:37 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> This is a resend of the
On 1/10/21 9:05 AM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> Tom,
>
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 07:46:29AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
>> On 1/7/21 8:09 AM, Tom Rix wrote:
>>> On 1/6/21 8:37 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
This is a resend of the previous (unfortunately late) patchset of
changes for FPGA DFL.
>>> Is
Tom,
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 07:46:29AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
>
> On 1/7/21 8:09 AM, Tom Rix wrote:
> > On 1/6/21 8:37 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> >> This is a resend of the previous (unfortunately late) patchset of
> >> changes for FPGA DFL.
> > Is there something I can do to help ?
> >
> > I
On 1/7/21 8:09 AM, Tom Rix wrote:
> On 1/6/21 8:37 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
>> This is a resend of the previous (unfortunately late) patchset of
>> changes for FPGA DFL.
> Is there something I can do to help ?
>
> I am paid to look after linux-fpga, so i have plenty of time.
>
> Some ideas of
On 1/7/21 8:14 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 08:09:12AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
>> On 1/6/21 8:37 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
>>> This is a resend of the previous (unfortunately late) patchset of
>>> changes for FPGA DFL.
>> Is there something I can do to help ?
> This is all now
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 08:09:12AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
>
> On 1/6/21 8:37 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> > This is a resend of the previous (unfortunately late) patchset of
> > changes for FPGA DFL.
>
> Is there something I can do to help ?
This is all now merged in my tree, so there's not much
On 1/6/21 8:37 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> This is a resend of the previous (unfortunately late) patchset of
> changes for FPGA DFL.
Is there something I can do to help ?
I am paid to look after linux-fpga, so i have plenty of time.
Some ideas of what i am doing now privately i can do
This is a resend of the previous (unfortunately late) patchset of
changes for FPGA DFL.
This contains Matthew's changes to allow for more flexible discovery of
DFLs.
Xu's changeset adds support for DFL device drivers. Two of the first
users are part of the patchset: dfl-emif a memory controller,
19 matches
Mail list logo
