Re: [PATCH 0/9] posix_clocks: Prepare syscalls for 64 bit time_t conversion

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> > On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Thomas

Re: [PATCH 0/9] posix_clocks: Prepare syscalls for 64 bit time_t conversion

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> > On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Thomas Gleixner >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> No,

Re: [PATCH 0/9] posix_clocks: Prepare syscalls for 64 bit time_t conversion

On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Thomas Gleixner > >> wrote: > >> > >> No, syscall that existing 32-bit

Re: [PATCH 0/9] posix_clocks: Prepare syscalls for 64 bit time_t conversion

On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Thomas Gleixner > >> wrote: > >> > >> No, syscall that existing 32-bit user space enters would be handled by >

Re: [PATCH 0/9] posix_clocks: Prepare syscalls for 64 bit time_t conversion

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> No, syscall that existing 32-bit user space enters would be handled by >>

Re: [PATCH 0/9] posix_clocks: Prepare syscalls for 64 bit time_t conversion

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> No, syscall that existing 32-bit user space enters would be handled by >> compat_sys_nanosleep() on both 32-bit and 64-bit kernels

Re: [PATCH 0/9] posix_clocks: Prepare syscalls for 64 bit time_t conversion

On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Thomas Gleixner > >> wrote: > >> > On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Deepa Dinamani

Re: [PATCH 0/9] posix_clocks: Prepare syscalls for 64 bit time_t conversion

On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Thomas Gleixner > >> wrote: > >> > On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Deepa Dinamani wrote: > >> >> Would this work for

Re: [PATCH 0/9] posix_clocks: Prepare syscalls for 64 bit time_t conversion

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> > On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Deepa Dinamani wrote: >> >> Would this work for everyone? >> > >> >

Re: [PATCH 0/9] posix_clocks: Prepare syscalls for 64 bit time_t conversion

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> > On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Deepa Dinamani wrote: >> >> Would this work for everyone? >> > >> > Having extra config switches which are

Re: [PATCH 0/9] posix_clocks: Prepare syscalls for 64 bit time_t conversion

On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Deepa Dinamani wrote: > >> Would this work for everyone? > > > > Having extra config switches which are selectable by architectures and > > removed

Re: [PATCH 0/9] posix_clocks: Prepare syscalls for 64 bit time_t conversion

On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Deepa Dinamani wrote: > >> Would this work for everyone? > > > > Having extra config switches which are selectable by architectures and > > removed when everything is

Re: [PATCH 0/9] posix_clocks: Prepare syscalls for 64 bit time_t conversion

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Deepa Dinamani wrote: >> > I had on concern about x32, maybe we should check >> > for "COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME" before zeroing out the tv_nsec >> > bits. >> >> Thanks, I think you are right. I had

Re: [PATCH 0/9] posix_clocks: Prepare syscalls for 64 bit time_t conversion

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Deepa Dinamani wrote: >> > I had on concern about x32, maybe we should check >> > for "COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME" before zeroing out the tv_nsec >> > bits. >> >> Thanks, I think you are right. I had the check conditional

Re: [PATCH 0/9] posix_clocks: Prepare syscalls for 64 bit time_t conversion

On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Deepa Dinamani wrote: > > I had on concern about x32, maybe we should check > > for "COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME" before zeroing out the tv_nsec > > bits. > > Thanks, I think you are right. I had the check conditional on > CONFIG_64BIT_TIME and then removed as I forgot why I added

Re: [PATCH 0/9] posix_clocks: Prepare syscalls for 64 bit time_t conversion

On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Deepa Dinamani wrote: > > I had on concern about x32, maybe we should check > > for "COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME" before zeroing out the tv_nsec > > bits. > > Thanks, I think you are right. I had the check conditional on > CONFIG_64BIT_TIME and then removed as I forgot why I added

Re: [PATCH 0/9] posix_clocks: Prepare syscalls for 64 bit time_t conversion

> I had on concern about x32, maybe we should check > for "COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME" before zeroing out the tv_nsec > bits. Thanks, I think you are right. I had the check conditional on CONFIG_64BIT_TIME and then removed as I forgot why I added it. :) > Regarding

Re: [PATCH 0/9] posix_clocks: Prepare syscalls for 64 bit time_t conversion

> I had on concern about x32, maybe we should check > for "COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME" before zeroing out the tv_nsec > bits. Thanks, I think you are right. I had the check conditional on CONFIG_64BIT_TIME and then removed as I forgot why I added it. :) > Regarding

Re: [PATCH 0/9] posix_clocks: Prepare syscalls for 64 bit time_t conversion

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Deepa Dinamani wrote: > The series is a preparation series for individual architectures > to use 64 bit time_t syscalls in compat and 32 bit emulation modes. > > This is a follow up to the series Arnd Bergmann posted: >

Re: [PATCH 0/9] posix_clocks: Prepare syscalls for 64 bit time_t conversion

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Deepa Dinamani wrote: > The series is a preparation series for individual architectures > to use 64 bit time_t syscalls in compat and 32 bit emulation modes. > > This is a follow up to the series Arnd Bergmann posted: >

[PATCH 0/9] posix_clocks: Prepare syscalls for 64 bit time_t conversion

The series is a preparation series for individual architectures to use 64 bit time_t syscalls in compat and 32 bit emulation modes. This is a follow up to the series Arnd Bergmann posted: https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2015-05/msg00070.html Big picture is as per the lwn article:

[PATCH 0/9] posix_clocks: Prepare syscalls for 64 bit time_t conversion

The series is a preparation series for individual architectures to use 64 bit time_t syscalls in compat and 32 bit emulation modes. This is a follow up to the series Arnd Bergmann posted: https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2015-05/msg00070.html Big picture is as per the lwn article: