Re: [PATCH 00/13] drm/kms/mode: using helper func drm_display_mode_to/from_videomode for calculating timing parameters

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Satendra Singh Thakur wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2018 at 16:28:30 +0530, Satendra Singh Thakur wrote: >> On Thu, May 07, 2018 at 15:46:02 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 01:53:55PM +0530, Satendra Singh Thakur wrote:

Re: [PATCH 00/13] drm/kms/mode: using helper func drm_display_mode_to/from_videomode for calculating timing parameters

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Satendra Singh Thakur wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2018 at 16:28:30 +0530, Satendra Singh Thakur wrote: >> On Thu, May 07, 2018 at 15:46:02 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 01:53:55PM +0530, Satendra Singh Thakur wrote: >> > > 1.There is a

Re: [PATCH 00/13] drm/kms/mode: using helper func drm_display_mode_to/from_videomode for calculating timing parameters

On Thu, May 08, 2018 at 16:28:30 +0530, Satendra Singh Thakur wrote: > On Thu, May 07, 2018 at 15:46:02 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 01:53:55PM +0530, Satendra Singh Thakur wrote: > > > 1.There is a function in drm-core to calculate display timing parameters: > > >

Re: [PATCH 00/13] drm/kms/mode: using helper func drm_display_mode_to/from_videomode for calculating timing parameters

On Thu, May 08, 2018 at 16:28:30 +0530, Satendra Singh Thakur wrote: > On Thu, May 07, 2018 at 15:46:02 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 01:53:55PM +0530, Satendra Singh Thakur wrote: > > > 1.There is a function in drm-core to calculate display timing parameters: > > >

Re: [PATCH 00/13] drm/kms/mode: using helper func drm_display_mode_to/from_videomode for calculating timing parameters

On Thu, May 07, 2018 at 15:46:02 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 01:53:55PM +0530, Satendra Singh Thakur wrote: > > 1.There is a function in drm-core to calculate display timing parameters: > > horizontal front porch, back porch, sync length, > > vertical front porch, back

Re: [PATCH 00/13] drm/kms/mode: using helper func drm_display_mode_to/from_videomode for calculating timing parameters

On Thu, May 07, 2018 at 15:46:02 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 01:53:55PM +0530, Satendra Singh Thakur wrote: > > 1.There is a function in drm-core to calculate display timing parameters: > > horizontal front porch, back porch, sync length, > > vertical front porch, back

Re: [PATCH 00/13] drm/kms/mode: using helper func drm_display_mode_to/from_videomode for calculating timing parameters

On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 01:53:55PM +0530, Satendra Singh Thakur wrote: > 1.There is a function in drm-core to calculate display timing parameters: > horizontal front porch, back porch, sync length, > vertical front porch, back porch, sync length and > clock in Hz. > However, some drivers are still

Re: [PATCH 00/13] drm/kms/mode: using helper func drm_display_mode_to/from_videomode for calculating timing parameters

On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 01:53:55PM +0530, Satendra Singh Thakur wrote: > 1.There is a function in drm-core to calculate display timing parameters: > horizontal front porch, back porch, sync length, > vertical front porch, back porch, sync length and > clock in Hz. > However, some drivers are still

[PATCH 00/13] drm/kms/mode: using helper func drm_display_mode_to/from_videomode for calculating timing parameters

1.There is a function in drm-core to calculate display timing parameters: horizontal front porch, back porch, sync length, vertical front porch, back porch, sync length and clock in Hz. However, some drivers are still calculating these parameters themselves. Therefore, there is a duplication of

[PATCH 00/13] drm/kms/mode: using helper func drm_display_mode_to/from_videomode for calculating timing parameters

1.There is a function in drm-core to calculate display timing parameters: horizontal front porch, back porch, sync length, vertical front porch, back porch, sync length and clock in Hz. However, some drivers are still calculating these parameters themselves. Therefore, there is a duplication of