So far the only difference between v5 I have is that I split the update
of tracing_fill_pipe_page() out of "tracing: Use trace_seq_used() and
seq_buf_used() instead of len", and this:
-- Steve
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 9f1ffc707f3b..9023446b2c2b 100644
---
So far the only difference between v5 I have is that I split the update
of tracing_fill_pipe_page() out of tracing: Use trace_seq_used() and
seq_buf_used() instead of len, and this:
-- Steve
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 9f1ffc707f3b..9023446b2c2b 100644
---
Version 5!
Full diff between v4 and v5 will be replied to this email.
Here's the summary of the differences since version 4:
. Various clean ups
. Added trace_seq_used() to be used instead of s->seq.len
. Used seq_buf_used() instead of s->len
. Fixed output of ftrace_raw_output_prep() as
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 23:58:47 -0500
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Version 5!
>
> Full diff between v4 and v5 will be replied to this email.
>
Here it is:
-- Steve
diff --git a/include/linux/seq_buf.h b/include/linux/seq_buf.h
index da211dfbcebe..9aafe0e24c68 100644
--- a/include/linux/seq_buf.h
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 23:58:47 -0500
Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
Version 5!
Full diff between v4 and v5 will be replied to this email.
Here it is:
-- Steve
diff --git a/include/linux/seq_buf.h b/include/linux/seq_buf.h
index da211dfbcebe..9aafe0e24c68 100644
---
Version 5!
Full diff between v4 and v5 will be replied to this email.
Here's the summary of the differences since version 4:
. Various clean ups
. Added trace_seq_used() to be used instead of s-seq.len
. Used seq_buf_used() instead of s-len
. Fixed output of ftrace_raw_output_prep() as
6 matches
Mail list logo
