Re: [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7

On 24/06/16 17:50, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 04:35:45PM +1000, Balbir Singh wrote: >>> 1. The residency of a page partially depends on what zone the page was >>>allocated from. This is partially combatted by the fair zone allocation >>>policy but that is a partial

Re: [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7

On 24/06/16 17:50, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 04:35:45PM +1000, Balbir Singh wrote: >>> 1. The residency of a page partially depends on what zone the page was >>>allocated from. This is partially combatted by the fair zone allocation >>>policy but that is a partial

Re: [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 04:35:45PM +1000, Balbir Singh wrote: > > 1. The residency of a page partially depends on what zone the page was > >allocated from. This is partially combatted by the fair zone allocation > >policy but that is a partial solution that introduces overhead in the > >

Re: [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 04:35:45PM +1000, Balbir Singh wrote: > > 1. The residency of a page partially depends on what zone the page was > >allocated from. This is partially combatted by the fair zone allocation > >policy but that is a partial solution that introduces overhead in the > >

Re: [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7

On 22/06/16 00:15, Mel Gorman wrote: > (sorry for resend, the previous attempt didn't go through fully for > some reason) > > The bulk of the updates are in response to review from Vlastimil Babka > and received a lot more testing than v6. > > Changelog since v6 > o Correct reclaim_idx when

Re: [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7

On 22/06/16 00:15, Mel Gorman wrote: > (sorry for resend, the previous attempt didn't go through fully for > some reason) > > The bulk of the updates are in response to review from Vlastimil Babka > and received a lot more testing than v6. > > Changelog since v6 > o Correct reclaim_idx when

Re: [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:26:48 +0100 Mel Gorman wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 03:15:39PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > The bulk of the updates are in response to review from Vlastimil Babka > > and received a lot more testing than v6. > > > > Hi Andrew, > >

Re: [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:26:48 +0100 Mel Gorman wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 03:15:39PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > The bulk of the updates are in response to review from Vlastimil Babka > > and received a lot more testing than v6. > > > > Hi Andrew, > > Please drop these patches again

Re: [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7

On Thu 23-06-16 13:33:47, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 01:27:14PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 23-06-16 11:26:48, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 03:15:39PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > The bulk of the updates are in response to review from Vlastimil

Re: [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7

On Thu 23-06-16 13:33:47, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 01:27:14PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 23-06-16 11:26:48, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 03:15:39PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > The bulk of the updates are in response to review from Vlastimil

Re: [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 01:27:14PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 23-06-16 11:26:48, Mel Gorman wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 03:15:39PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > The bulk of the updates are in response to review from Vlastimil Babka > > > and received a lot more testing than v6. >

Re: [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 01:27:14PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 23-06-16 11:26:48, Mel Gorman wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 03:15:39PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > The bulk of the updates are in response to review from Vlastimil Babka > > > and received a lot more testing than v6. >

Re: [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7

On Thu 23-06-16 11:26:48, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 03:15:39PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > The bulk of the updates are in response to review from Vlastimil Babka > > and received a lot more testing than v6. > > > > Hi Andrew, > > Please drop these patches again from mmotm. >

Re: [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7

On Thu 23-06-16 11:26:48, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 03:15:39PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > The bulk of the updates are in response to review from Vlastimil Babka > > and received a lot more testing than v6. > > > > Hi Andrew, > > Please drop these patches again from mmotm. >

Re: [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 03:15:39PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > The bulk of the updates are in response to review from Vlastimil Babka > and received a lot more testing than v6. > Hi Andrew, Please drop these patches again from mmotm. There has been a number of odd conflicts resulting in at

Re: [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 03:15:39PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > The bulk of the updates are in response to review from Vlastimil Babka > and received a lot more testing than v6. > Hi Andrew, Please drop these patches again from mmotm. There has been a number of odd conflicts resulting in at

[PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7

(sorry for resend, the previous attempt didn't go through fully for some reason) The bulk of the updates are in response to review from Vlastimil Babka and received a lot more testing than v6. Changelog since v6 o Correct reclaim_idx when direct reclaiming for memcg o Also account LRU pages per

[PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7

(sorry for resend, the previous attempt didn't go through fully for some reason) The bulk of the updates are in response to review from Vlastimil Babka and received a lot more testing than v6. Changelog since v6 o Correct reclaim_idx when direct reclaiming for memcg o Also account LRU pages per

[PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7

The bulk of the updates are in response to review from Vlastimil Babka and received a lot more testing than v6. Changelog since v6 o Correct reclaim_idx when direct reclaiming for memcg o Also account LRU pages per zone for compaction/reclaim o Add page_pgdat helper with more efficient lookup o

[PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7

The bulk of the updates are in response to review from Vlastimil Babka and received a lot more testing than v6. Changelog since v6 o Correct reclaim_idx when direct reclaiming for memcg o Also account LRU pages per zone for compaction/reclaim o Add page_pgdat helper with more efficient lookup o