On Wed, 5 Dec 2012, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 16:27:43 +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> >> HID descriptors contains 4 bytes of reserved field.
> >> The previous implementation was overriding the next fields in struct
> >> i2c_hid.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Benjamin
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 16:27:43 +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
>> HID descriptors contains 4 bytes of reserved field.
>> The previous implementation was overriding the next fields in struct i2c_hid.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires
>>
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org wrote:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 16:27:43 +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
HID descriptors contains 4 bytes of reserved field.
The previous implementation was overriding the next fields in struct i2c_hid.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 16:27:43 +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
HID descriptors contains 4 bytes of reserved field.
The previous implementation was overriding the next fields in struct
i2c_hid.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 16:27:43 +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> HID descriptors contains 4 bytes of reserved field.
> The previous implementation was overriding the next fields in struct i2c_hid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires
> ---
> drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 16:27:43 +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
HID descriptors contains 4 bytes of reserved field.
The previous implementation was overriding the next fields in struct i2c_hid.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires benjamin.tissoi...@gmail.com
---
drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c |
6 matches
Mail list logo