On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 16:25 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> + if (insn->type != INSN_JUMP_DYNAMIC &&
> + insn->type != INSN_CALL_DYNAMIC) {
> + WARN_FUNC("retpoline_safe hint not a indirect
> jump/call",
> +
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 16:25 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> + if (insn->type != INSN_JUMP_DYNAMIC &&
> + insn->type != INSN_CALL_DYNAMIC) {
> + WARN_FUNC("retpoline_safe hint not a indirect
> jump/call",
> +
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 04:25:41PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> David requested a objtool validation pass for RETPOLINE enabled
> builds, where it validates no unannotated indirect jumps or calls are
> left.
>
> Add an additional .discard.retpoline_safe section to allow annotating
> the few
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 04:25:41PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> David requested a objtool validation pass for RETPOLINE enabled
> builds, where it validates no unannotated indirect jumps or calls are
> left.
>
> Add an additional .discard.retpoline_safe section to allow annotating
> the few
David requested a objtool validation pass for RETPOLINE enabled
builds, where it validates no unannotated indirect jumps or calls are
left.
Add an additional .discard.retpoline_safe section to allow annotating
the few indirect sites that are required and safe.
Requested-by: David Woodhouse
David requested a objtool validation pass for RETPOLINE enabled
builds, where it validates no unannotated indirect jumps or calls are
left.
Add an additional .discard.retpoline_safe section to allow annotating
the few indirect sites that are required and safe.
Requested-by: David Woodhouse
6 matches
Mail list logo
