[PATCH 03/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: use list_first_entry in ldlm_lockd.c

[NeilBrown]

This is only a small simplification, but it makes the code
a little clearer.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.com>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c 
b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c
index ada50b69c5f6..5f6e7c933b81 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c
@@ -696,13 +696,13 @@ static int ldlm_bl_get_work(struct ldlm_bl_pool *blp,
        /* process a request from the blp_list at least every blp_num_threads */
        if (!list_empty(&blp->blp_list) &&
            (list_empty(&blp->blp_prio_list) || num_bl == 0))
-               blwi = list_entry(blp->blp_list.next,
-                                 struct ldlm_bl_work_item, blwi_entry);
+               blwi = list_first_entry(&blp->blp_list,
+                                       struct ldlm_bl_work_item, blwi_entry);
        else
                if (!list_empty(&blp->blp_prio_list))
-                       blwi = list_entry(blp->blp_prio_list.next,
-                                         struct ldlm_bl_work_item,
-                                         blwi_entry);
+                       blwi = list_first_entry(&blp->blp_prio_list,
+                                               struct ldlm_bl_work_item,
+                                               blwi_entry);
 
        if (blwi) {
                if (++num_bl >= num_th)