Hello,
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 09:26:03AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Yes this one is little odd. Ok, I will change it back to "service_tree"
> and only use "st" for local variables and in some function names.
Yes, please do that. In general, it's beneficial to use at least
somewhat descriptive
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:52:13PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Vivek Goyal writes:
>
> > At quite a few places we use the keyword "service_tree" and I feel that
> > names in CFQ are already very long and they need to be shortened a bit
> > where appropriate.
> >
> > So this patch just renames
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:52:13PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com writes:
At quite a few places we use the keyword service_tree and I feel that
names in CFQ are already very long and they need to be shortened a bit
where appropriate.
So this patch just renames
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 09:26:03AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
Yes this one is little odd. Ok, I will change it back to service_tree
and only use st for local variables and in some function names.
Yes, please do that. In general, it's beneficial to use at least
somewhat descriptive names
Vivek Goyal writes:
> At quite a few places we use the keyword "service_tree" and I feel that
> names in CFQ are already very long and they need to be shortened a bit
> where appropriate.
>
> So this patch just renames "service_tree" to "st" at most of the places.
> No functionality change.
At quite a few places we use the keyword "service_tree" and I feel that
names in CFQ are already very long and they need to be shortened a bit
where appropriate.
So this patch just renames "service_tree" to "st" at most of the places.
No functionality change.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal
---
At quite a few places we use the keyword service_tree and I feel that
names in CFQ are already very long and they need to be shortened a bit
where appropriate.
So this patch just renames service_tree to st at most of the places.
No functionality change.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal
Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com writes:
At quite a few places we use the keyword service_tree and I feel that
names in CFQ are already very long and they need to be shortened a bit
where appropriate.
So this patch just renames service_tree to st at most of the places.
No functionality change.
8 matches
Mail list logo