On 26 April 2013 14:49, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 07:23:20PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> Look for an idle CPU close to the pack buddy CPU whenever possible.
>> The goal is to prevent the wake up of a CPU which doesn't share the power
>> domain of the pack buddy CPU.
>>
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 07:23:20PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Look for an idle CPU close to the pack buddy CPU whenever possible.
> The goal is to prevent the wake up of a CPU which doesn't share the power
> domain of the pack buddy CPU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot
> Reviewed-by:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 07:23:20PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
Look for an idle CPU close to the pack buddy CPU whenever possible.
The goal is to prevent the wake up of a CPU which doesn't share the power
domain of the pack buddy CPU.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot
On 26 April 2013 14:49, Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 07:23:20PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
Look for an idle CPU close to the pack buddy CPU whenever possible.
The goal is to prevent the wake up of a CPU which doesn't share the power
domain of the pack
Look for an idle CPU close to the pack buddy CPU whenever possible.
The goal is to prevent the wake up of a CPU which doesn't share the power
domain of the pack buddy CPU.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot
Reviewed-by: Morten Rasmussen
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 19 +++
1 file
Look for an idle CPU close to the pack buddy CPU whenever possible.
The goal is to prevent the wake up of a CPU which doesn't share the power
domain of the pack buddy CPU.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot vincent.guit...@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Morten Rasmussen morten.rasmus...@arm.com
---
6 matches
Mail list logo
