On 10/31/2017 05:21 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> DAX support in brd is awkward because its backing page frames are
> distinct from the ones provided by pmem, dcssblk, or axonram. We need
> pfn_t_devmap() entries to fully support DAX, and the limited DAX support
> for pfn_t_special() page frames is
On 10/31/2017 05:21 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> DAX support in brd is awkward because its backing page frames are
> distinct from the ones provided by pmem, dcssblk, or axonram. We need
> pfn_t_devmap() entries to fully support DAX, and the limited DAX support
> for pfn_t_special() page frames is
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
DAX support in brd is awkward because its backing page frames are
distinct from the ones provided by pmem, dcssblk, or axonram. We need
pfn_t_devmap() entries to fully support DAX, and the limited DAX support
for pfn_t_special() page frames is not interesting for brd when pmem is
already a
DAX support in brd is awkward because its backing page frames are
distinct from the ones provided by pmem, dcssblk, or axonram. We need
pfn_t_devmap() entries to fully support DAX, and the limited DAX support
for pfn_t_special() page frames is not interesting for brd when pmem is
already a
6 matches
Mail list logo