On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 12:59 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> > index 2b0484a..bac1906 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> > @@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct
On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 12:59 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
diff --git a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
index 2b0484a..bac1906 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
@@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 05:11:59PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner
>
> rcu_read_unlock_special() checks in_serving_softirq() and leaves early
> when true. On RT this is obviously wrong as softirq processing context
> can be preempted and therefor such a task can
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 05:11:59PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
From: Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de
rcu_read_unlock_special() checks in_serving_softirq() and leaves early
when true. On RT this is obviously wrong as softirq processing context
can be preempted and therefor such
From: Thomas Gleixner
rcu_read_unlock_special() checks in_serving_softirq() and leaves early
when true. On RT this is obviously wrong as softirq processing context
can be preempted and therefor such a task can be on the gp_tasks
list. Leaving early here will leave the task on the list and
From: Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de
rcu_read_unlock_special() checks in_serving_softirq() and leaves early
when true. On RT this is obviously wrong as softirq processing context
can be preempted and therefor such a task can be on the gp_tasks
list. Leaving early here will leave the task on
6 matches
Mail list logo