On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 02:16:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> From: Rik van Riel
>
> We need pte_present to return true for _PAGE_PROTNONE pages, to indicate that
> the pte is associated with a page.
>
> However, for TLB flushing purposes, we would like to know whether the pte
> points to
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 02:16:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
From: Rik van Riel r...@redhat.com
We need pte_present to return true for _PAGE_PROTNONE pages, to indicate that
the pte is associated with a page.
However, for TLB flushing purposes, we would like to know whether the pte
NAK NAK NAK.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> +#define __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_ACCESSIBLE
> +static inline int pte_accessible(pte_t a)
Stop doing this f*cking crazy ad-hoc "I have some other name
available" #defines.
Use the same name, for chissake! Don't make up new random
From: Rik van Riel
We need pte_present to return true for _PAGE_PROTNONE pages, to indicate that
the pte is associated with a page.
However, for TLB flushing purposes, we would like to know whether the pte
points to an actually accessible page. This allows us to skip remote TLB
flushes for
From: Rik van Riel r...@redhat.com
We need pte_present to return true for _PAGE_PROTNONE pages, to indicate that
the pte is associated with a page.
However, for TLB flushing purposes, we would like to know whether the pte
points to an actually accessible page. This allows us to skip remote TLB
NAK NAK NAK.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Peter Zijlstra a.p.zijls...@chello.nl wrote:
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_ACCESSIBLE
+static inline int pte_accessible(pte_t a)
Stop doing this f*cking crazy ad-hoc I have some other name
available #defines.
Use the same name, for chissake! Don't
6 matches
Mail list logo