Re: [PATCH 05/13] thermal: rcar: Document SoC-specific bindings

Hi Morimoto-san, On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: >> >> > > Required properties: >> >> > > -- compatible : "renesas,rcar-thermal" >> >> > > +- compatible : "renesas,thermal-", >> >> > > "renesas,rcar-thermal" >> >> > > + as

Re: [PATCH 05/13] thermal: rcar: Document SoC-specific bindings

Hi Morimoto-san, On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto...@gmail.com wrote: Required properties: -- compatible : renesas,rcar-thermal +- compatible : renesas,thermal-soctype, renesas,rcar-thermal + as

Re: [PATCH 05/13] thermal: rcar: Document SoC-specific bindings

Hi Geert > >> > > Required properties: > >> > > -- compatible : "renesas,rcar-thermal" > >> > > +- compatible : "renesas,thermal-", > >> > > "renesas,rcar-thermal" > >> > > + as fallback. > >> > > + Examples with soctypes are: > >> >

Re: [PATCH 05/13] thermal: rcar: Document SoC-specific bindings

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: >> > > The documentation only mentioned the generic fallback compatible >> > > property. >> > > Add the missing SoC-specific compatible properties, some of which are >> > > already in use. >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven

Re: [PATCH 05/13] thermal: rcar: Document SoC-specific bindings

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto...@renesas.com wrote: The documentation only mentioned the generic fallback compatible property. Add the missing SoC-specific compatible properties, some of which are already in use. Signed-off-by: Geert

Re: [PATCH 05/13] thermal: rcar: Document SoC-specific bindings

Hi Geert Required properties: -- compatible : renesas,rcar-thermal +- compatible : renesas,thermal-soctype, renesas,rcar-thermal + as fallback. + Examples with soctypes are: + -

Re: [PATCH 05/13] thermal: rcar: Document SoC-specific bindings

Hi Simon > 1. That the (in this case thermal) IP on the SoC's listed is known >to work with the driver using the generic (in this case >renesas,rcar-thermal) compatibility string. > > 2. That if some incompatibility is subsequently found such that the >IP on SoC does function

Re: [PATCH 05/13] thermal: rcar: Document SoC-specific bindings

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:16:06PM -0700, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > Hi > > > > > The documentation only mentioned the generic fallback compatible > > > > property. > > > > Add the missing SoC-specific compatible properties, some of which are > > > > already in use. > > > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH 05/13] thermal: rcar: Document SoC-specific bindings

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:16:06PM -0700, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: Hi The documentation only mentioned the generic fallback compatible property. Add the missing SoC-specific compatible properties, some of which are already in use. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven

Re: [PATCH 05/13] thermal: rcar: Document SoC-specific bindings

Hi Simon 1. That the (in this case thermal) IP on the SoC's listed is known to work with the driver using the generic (in this case renesas,rcar-thermal) compatibility string. 2. That if some incompatibility is subsequently found such that the IP on SoC does function correctly

Re: [PATCH 05/13] thermal: rcar: Document SoC-specific bindings

Hi > > > The documentation only mentioned the generic fallback compatible property. > > > Add the missing SoC-specific compatible properties, some of which are > > > already in use. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > > > Cc: Zhang Rui > > > Cc: Eduardo Valentin > > > Cc:

Re: [PATCH 05/13] thermal: rcar: Document SoC-specific bindings

On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 11:13 +0200, Simon Horman wrote: > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:23:35PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > The documentation only mentioned the generic fallback compatible property. > > Add the missing SoC-specific compatible properties, some of which are > > already in use.

Re: [PATCH 05/13] thermal: rcar: Document SoC-specific bindings

On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 11:13 +0200, Simon Horman wrote: On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:23:35PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: The documentation only mentioned the generic fallback compatible property. Add the missing SoC-specific compatible properties, some of which are already in use.

Re: [PATCH 05/13] thermal: rcar: Document SoC-specific bindings

Hi The documentation only mentioned the generic fallback compatible property. Add the missing SoC-specific compatible properties, some of which are already in use. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven geert+rene...@glider.be Cc: Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com Cc: Eduardo

Re: [PATCH 05/13] thermal: rcar: Document SoC-specific bindings

On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:23:35PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > The documentation only mentioned the generic fallback compatible property. > Add the missing SoC-specific compatible properties, some of which are > already in use. > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > Cc: Zhang Rui > Cc:

Re: [PATCH 05/13] thermal: rcar: Document SoC-specific bindings

On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:23:35PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: The documentation only mentioned the generic fallback compatible property. Add the missing SoC-specific compatible properties, some of which are already in use. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven geert+rene...@glider.be Cc:

[PATCH 05/13] thermal: rcar: Document SoC-specific bindings

The documentation only mentioned the generic fallback compatible property. Add the missing SoC-specific compatible properties, some of which are already in use. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Zhang Rui Cc: Eduardo Valentin Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org ---

[PATCH 05/13] thermal: rcar: Document SoC-specific bindings

The documentation only mentioned the generic fallback compatible property. Add the missing SoC-specific compatible properties, some of which are already in use. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven geert+rene...@glider.be Cc: Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com Cc: Eduardo Valentin eduardo.valen...@ti.com