Hi,
On 2018년 05월 30일 05:57, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 04:32:37PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>
>> IMHO, you better to split out the devfreq patches from
>> 'throttler' patch set. Because I'm not sure throttler is either
>> necessary or not.
>>
>> After finishing the review
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 10:08:26AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 01:30:41PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/Makefile b/drivers/misc/Makefile
> > index 20be70c3f118..01a1714dd2ad 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 04:32:37PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> IMHO, you better to split out the devfreq patches from
> 'throttler' patch set. Because I'm not sure throttler is either
> necessary or not.
>
> After finishing the review of 'throttler' patches without devfreq handling,
> it would b
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 01:30:41PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/Makefile b/drivers/misc/Makefile
> index 20be70c3f118..01a1714dd2ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/misc/Makefile
> @@ -57,3 +57,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ASPEED_LPC_SNOOP) += aspeed-lpc
Hi Matthias,
IMHO, you better to split out the devfreq patches from
'throttler' patch set. Because I'm not sure throttler is either
necessary or not.
After finishing the review of 'throttler' patches without devfreq handling,
it would be better for you to send devfreq patches separately.
Regards
The purpose of the throttler is to provide support for non-thermal
throttling. Throttling is triggered by external event, e.g. the
detection of a high battery discharge current, close to the OCP limit
of the battery. The throttler is only in charge of the throttling, not
the monitoring, which is do
6 matches
Mail list logo