Re: [PATCH 09/26 v5] tracing/probes: Do not use return value of trace_seq_printf()

2014-11-18 Thread Petr Mladek
On Fri 2014-11-14 23:58:56, Steven Rostedt wrote: > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" > > The functions trace_seq_printf() and friends will soon not have a return > value and will only be a void function. Use trace_seq_has_overflowed() > instead to know if the trace_seq operations succeeded or

Re: [PATCH 09/26 v5] tracing/probes: Do not use return value of trace_seq_printf()

2014-11-18 Thread Petr Mladek
On Fri 2014-11-14 23:58:56, Steven Rostedt wrote: From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) rost...@goodmis.org The functions trace_seq_printf() and friends will soon not have a return value and will only be a void function. Use trace_seq_has_overflowed() instead to know if the trace_seq operations

[PATCH 09/26 v5] tracing/probes: Do not use return value of trace_seq_printf()

2014-11-14 Thread Steven Rostedt
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" The functions trace_seq_printf() and friends will soon not have a return value and will only be a void function. Use trace_seq_has_overflowed() instead to know if the trace_seq operations succeeded or not. Link:

[PATCH 09/26 v5] tracing/probes: Do not use return value of trace_seq_printf()

2014-11-14 Thread Steven Rostedt
From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) rost...@goodmis.org The functions trace_seq_printf() and friends will soon not have a return value and will only be a void function. Use trace_seq_has_overflowed() instead to know if the trace_seq operations succeeded or not. Link: