Re: [PATCH 09/26 v5] tracing/probes: Do not use return value of trace_seq_printf()

2014-11-18 Thread Petr Mladek
On Fri 2014-11-14 23:58:56, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" 
> 
> The functions trace_seq_printf() and friends will soon not have a return
> value and will only be a void function. Use trace_seq_has_overflowed()
> instead to know if the trace_seq operations succeeded or not.
> 
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141114011411.530216...@goodmis.org
> 
> Cc: Namhyung Kim 
> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt 

Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek 

Best Regards,
Petr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 09/26 v5] tracing/probes: Do not use return value of trace_seq_printf()

2014-11-18 Thread Petr Mladek
On Fri 2014-11-14 23:58:56, Steven Rostedt wrote:
 From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) rost...@goodmis.org
 
 The functions trace_seq_printf() and friends will soon not have a return
 value and will only be a void function. Use trace_seq_has_overflowed()
 instead to know if the trace_seq operations succeeded or not.
 
 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141114011411.530216...@goodmis.org
 
 Cc: Namhyung Kim namhy...@kernel.org
 Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com
 Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org

Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz

Best Regards,
Petr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH 09/26 v5] tracing/probes: Do not use return value of trace_seq_printf()

2014-11-14 Thread Steven Rostedt
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" 

The functions trace_seq_printf() and friends will soon not have a return
value and will only be a void function. Use trace_seq_has_overflowed()
instead to know if the trace_seq operations succeeded or not.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141114011411.530216...@goodmis.org

Cc: Namhyung Kim 
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu 
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt 
---
 kernel/trace/trace_probe.c | 10 ++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
index d4b9fc22cd27..b983b2fd2ca1 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
@@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ const char *reserved_field_names[] = {
 int PRINT_TYPE_FUNC_NAME(type)(struct trace_seq *s, const char *name,  \
void *data, void *ent)  \
 {  \
-   return trace_seq_printf(s, " %s=" fmt, name, *(type *)data);\
+   trace_seq_printf(s, " %s=" fmt, name, *(type *)data);   \
+   return !trace_seq_has_overflowed(s);\
 }  \
 const char PRINT_TYPE_FMT_NAME(type)[] = fmt;  \
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(PRINT_TYPE_FUNC_NAME(type));
@@ -61,10 +62,11 @@ int PRINT_TYPE_FUNC_NAME(string)(struct trace_seq *s, const 
char *name,
int len = *(u32 *)data >> 16;
 
if (!len)
-   return trace_seq_printf(s, " %s=(fault)", name);
+   trace_seq_printf(s, " %s=(fault)", name);
else
-   return trace_seq_printf(s, " %s=\"%s\"", name,
-   (const char *)get_loc_data(data, ent));
+   trace_seq_printf(s, " %s=\"%s\"", name,
+(const char *)get_loc_data(data, ent));
+   return !trace_seq_has_overflowed(s);
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(PRINT_TYPE_FUNC_NAME(string));
 
-- 
2.1.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH 09/26 v5] tracing/probes: Do not use return value of trace_seq_printf()

2014-11-14 Thread Steven Rostedt
From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) rost...@goodmis.org

The functions trace_seq_printf() and friends will soon not have a return
value and will only be a void function. Use trace_seq_has_overflowed()
instead to know if the trace_seq operations succeeded or not.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141114011411.530216...@goodmis.org

Cc: Namhyung Kim namhy...@kernel.org
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org
---
 kernel/trace/trace_probe.c | 10 ++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
index d4b9fc22cd27..b983b2fd2ca1 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
@@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ const char *reserved_field_names[] = {
 int PRINT_TYPE_FUNC_NAME(type)(struct trace_seq *s, const char *name,  \
void *data, void *ent)  \
 {  \
-   return trace_seq_printf(s,  %s= fmt, name, *(type *)data);\
+   trace_seq_printf(s,  %s= fmt, name, *(type *)data);   \
+   return !trace_seq_has_overflowed(s);\
 }  \
 const char PRINT_TYPE_FMT_NAME(type)[] = fmt;  \
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(PRINT_TYPE_FUNC_NAME(type));
@@ -61,10 +62,11 @@ int PRINT_TYPE_FUNC_NAME(string)(struct trace_seq *s, const 
char *name,
int len = *(u32 *)data  16;
 
if (!len)
-   return trace_seq_printf(s,  %s=(fault), name);
+   trace_seq_printf(s,  %s=(fault), name);
else
-   return trace_seq_printf(s,  %s=\%s\, name,
-   (const char *)get_loc_data(data, ent));
+   trace_seq_printf(s,  %s=\%s\, name,
+(const char *)get_loc_data(data, ent));
+   return !trace_seq_has_overflowed(s);
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(PRINT_TYPE_FUNC_NAME(string));
 
-- 
2.1.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/