On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 01:05:03PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > FYI, here's the Calgary diff on top of the outstanding Calgary
> > changes.
>
> When are these bits being merged into mainline? I'll hang on to this
> version for helping me rebase the arch bits of chained sglists once
> that
On Tue, Jul 17 2007, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:47:23AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> > This prepares x86-64 for sg chaining support.
> >
> > Additional improvements/fixups for pci-gart from
> > Benny Halevy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:47:23AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> This prepares x86-64 for sg chaining support.
>
> Additional improvements/fixups for pci-gart from
> Benny Halevy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:51:23AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17 2007, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 09:38:59AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jul 17 2007, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> >
> > > > The Xen and Calgary bits are mutually exclusive, so
On Tue, Jul 17 2007, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 09:38:59AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 17 2007, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
>
> > > The Xen and Calgary bits are mutually exclusive, so hopefully (a)
> > > will not be held up on account of the Xen merge (or for any
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 09:38:59AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17 2007, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > The Xen and Calgary bits are mutually exclusive, so hopefully (a)
> > will not be held up on account of the Xen merge (or for any other
> > reason... CalIOC2 machines which are out there
On Tue, Jul 17 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:10:03 +0200
> > Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jul 16 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:47:23 +0200
> > > > Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, Jul 17 2007, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 01:34:27PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > I'll keep rebasing sglist and the other branches I pull into for-akpm,
> > > so you can just re-enable the for-akpm pull when the a) is true.
> >
> > Andi's tree is very out of
On Mon, Jul 16 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:10:03 +0200
> Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 16 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:47:23 +0200
> > > Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This prepares x86-64 for sg
On Mon, Jul 16 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:10:03 +0200
Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:47:23 +0200
Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This prepares x86-64 for sg chaining support.
On Tue, Jul 17 2007, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 01:34:27PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
I'll keep rebasing sglist and the other branches I pull into for-akpm,
so you can just re-enable the for-akpm pull when the a) is true.
Andi's tree is very out of date and is
On Tue, Jul 17 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:10:03 +0200
Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:47:23 +0200
Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 09:38:59AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17 2007, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
The Xen and Calgary bits are mutually exclusive, so hopefully (a)
will not be held up on account of the Xen merge (or for any other
reason... CalIOC2 machines which are out there won't
On Tue, Jul 17 2007, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 09:38:59AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17 2007, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
The Xen and Calgary bits are mutually exclusive, so hopefully (a)
will not be held up on account of the Xen merge (or for any other
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:51:23AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17 2007, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 09:38:59AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17 2007, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
The Xen and Calgary bits are mutually exclusive, so hopefully (a)
will
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:47:23AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
This prepares x86-64 for sg chaining support.
Additional improvements/fixups for pci-gart from
Benny Halevy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Tue, Jul 17 2007, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:47:23AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
This prepares x86-64 for sg chaining support.
Additional improvements/fixups for pci-gart from
Benny Halevy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 01:05:03PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
FYI, here's the Calgary diff on top of the outstanding Calgary
changes.
When are these bits being merged into mainline? I'll hang on to this
version for helping me rebase the arch bits of chained sglists once
that happens.
I
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 01:34:27PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I'll keep rebasing sglist and the other branches I pull into for-akpm,
> > so you can just re-enable the for-akpm pull when the a) is true.
>
> Andi's tree is very out of date and is about to be damaged (to what
> extent I don't
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:10:03 +0200
Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:47:23 +0200
> > Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > This prepares x86-64 for sg chaining support.
> > >
> > > Additional
On Mon, Jul 16 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:47:23 +0200
> Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This prepares x86-64 for sg chaining support.
> >
> > Additional improvements/fixups for pci-gart from
> > Benny Halevy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:47:23 +0200
Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This prepares x86-64 for sg chaining support.
>
> Additional improvements/fixups for pci-gart from
> Benny Halevy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
This prepares x86-64 for sg chaining support.
Additional improvements/fixups for pci-gart from
Benny Halevy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/x86_64/kernel/pci-calgary.c | 25 --
arch/x86_64/kernel/pci-gart.c| 63
This prepares x86-64 for sg chaining support.
Additional improvements/fixups for pci-gart from
Benny Halevy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/x86_64/kernel/pci-calgary.c | 25 --
arch/x86_64/kernel/pci-gart.c| 63
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:47:23 +0200
Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This prepares x86-64 for sg chaining support.
Additional improvements/fixups for pci-gart from
Benny Halevy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Mon, Jul 16 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:47:23 +0200
Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This prepares x86-64 for sg chaining support.
Additional improvements/fixups for pci-gart from
Benny Halevy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:10:03 +0200
Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:47:23 +0200
Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This prepares x86-64 for sg chaining support.
Additional improvements/fixups for pci-gart from
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 01:34:27PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
I'll keep rebasing sglist and the other branches I pull into for-akpm,
so you can just re-enable the for-akpm pull when the a) is true.
Andi's tree is very out of date and is about to be damaged (to what
extent I don't yet
28 matches
Mail list logo