merged into cifs-2.6.git for-next
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:18:49 -0400
> Chengyu Song wrote:
>
>> posix_lock_file_wait may fail under certain circumstances, and its result is
>> usually checked/returned. But given the complexity of cifs, I'm
merged into cifs-2.6.git for-next
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Jeff Layton jeff.lay...@primarydata.com wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:18:49 -0400
Chengyu Song cson...@gatech.edu wrote:
posix_lock_file_wait may fail under certain circumstances, and its result is
usually checked/returned.
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:18:49 -0400
Chengyu Song wrote:
> posix_lock_file_wait may fail under certain circumstances, and its result is
> usually checked/returned. But given the complexity of cifs, I'm not sure if
> the result is intentially left unchecked and always expected to succeed.
>
>
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:18:49 -0400
Chengyu Song cson...@gatech.edu wrote:
posix_lock_file_wait may fail under certain circumstances, and its result is
usually checked/returned. But given the complexity of cifs, I'm not sure if
the result is intentially left unchecked and always expected to
> On Mar 24, 2015, at 10:29 PM, Steve French wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Chengyu Song wrote:
>> posix_lock_file_wait may fail under certain circumstances, and its result is
>> usually checked/returned. But given the complexity of cifs, I'm not sure if
>> the result is
On Mar 24, 2015, at 10:29 PM, Steve French smfre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Chengyu Song cson...@gatech.edu wrote:
posix_lock_file_wait may fail under certain circumstances, and its result is
usually checked/returned. But given the complexity of cifs, I'm not sure
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Chengyu Song wrote:
> posix_lock_file_wait may fail under certain circumstances, and its result is
> usually checked/returned. But given the complexity of cifs, I'm not sure if
> the result is intentially left unchecked and always expected to succeed.
>
>
posix_lock_file_wait may fail under certain circumstances, and its result is
usually checked/returned. But given the complexity of cifs, I'm not sure if
the result is intentially left unchecked and always expected to succeed.
Signed-off-by: Chengyu Song
---
fs/cifs/file.c | 4 ++--
1 file
posix_lock_file_wait may fail under certain circumstances, and its result is
usually checked/returned. But given the complexity of cifs, I'm not sure if
the result is intentially left unchecked and always expected to succeed.
Signed-off-by: Chengyu Song cson...@gatech.edu
---
fs/cifs/file.c | 4
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Chengyu Song cson...@gatech.edu wrote:
posix_lock_file_wait may fail under certain circumstances, and its result is
usually checked/returned. But given the complexity of cifs, I'm not sure if
the result is intentially left unchecked and always expected to
10 matches
Mail list logo