RE: [PATCH 1/1] clk: aspeed: Fix APLL calculate formula for ast2600-A2

2021-01-18 Thread Ryan Chen
> Jeffery > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] clk: aspeed: Fix APLL calculate formula for > ast2600-A2 > > On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 03:04, Ryan Chen > wrote: > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Joel Stanley > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 19,

Re: [PATCH 1/1] clk: aspeed: Fix APLL calculate formula for ast2600-A2

2021-01-18 Thread Joel Stanley
er.kernel.org; > > andre...@au1.ibm.com; BMC-SW > > Cc: j...@jms.id.au; Andrew Jeffery > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] clk: aspeed: Fix APLL calculate formula for > > ast2600-A2 > > > > On Mon, 2021-01-18 at 18:08 +0800, Ryan Chen wrote: > > > AST2600A1/

RE: [PATCH 1/1] clk: aspeed: Fix APLL calculate formula for ast2600-A2

2021-01-18 Thread Ryan Chen
w Jeffery > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] clk: aspeed: Fix APLL calculate formula for > ast2600-A2 > > On Mon, 2021-01-18 at 18:08 +0800, Ryan Chen wrote: > > AST2600A1/A2 have different pll calculate formula. > > To clarify, only the A0 has the old calculation, and all s

Re: [PATCH 1/1] clk: aspeed: Fix APLL calculate formula for ast2600-A2

2021-01-18 Thread Joel Stanley
On Mon, 2021-01-18 at 18:08 +0800, Ryan Chen wrote: > AST2600A1/A2 have different pll calculate formula. To clarify, only the A0 has the old calculation, and all subsequent revisions use the new calculation? If this is the case, do we need to support A0 in mainline linux, or should we drop

[PATCH 1/1] clk: aspeed: Fix APLL calculate formula for ast2600-A2

2021-01-18 Thread Ryan Chen
AST2600A1/A2 have different pll calculate formula. Signed-off-by: Ryan Chen --- drivers/clk/clk-ast2600.c | 37 +++-- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-ast2600.c b/drivers/clk/clk-ast2600.c index