Pan Bian writes:
> Function orinoco_ioctl_commit() returns 0 (indicates success) when the
> call to orinoco_lock() fails. Thus, the return value is inconsistent with
> the execution status. It may be better to return "-EBUSY" when the call
> to orinoco_lock() fails.
>
>
Pan Bian writes:
> Function orinoco_ioctl_commit() returns 0 (indicates success) when the
> call to orinoco_lock() fails. Thus, the return value is inconsistent with
> the execution status. It may be better to return "-EBUSY" when the call
> to orinoco_lock() fails.
>
> Bugzilla:
Function orinoco_ioctl_commit() returns 0 (indicates success) when the
call to orinoco_lock() fails. Thus, the return value is inconsistent with
the execution status. It may be better to return "-EBUSY" when the call
to orinoco_lock() fails.
Bugzilla:
Function orinoco_ioctl_commit() returns 0 (indicates success) when the
call to orinoco_lock() fails. Thus, the return value is inconsistent with
the execution status. It may be better to return "-EBUSY" when the call
to orinoco_lock() fails.
Bugzilla:
Function orinoco_ioctl_commit() returns 0 (indicates success) when the
call to orinoco_lock() fails. Thus, the return value is inconsistent with
the execution status. It may be better to return "-EBUSY" when the call
to orinoco_lock() fails.
Bugzilla:
Function orinoco_ioctl_commit() returns 0 (indicates success) when the
call to orinoco_lock() fails. Thus, the return value is inconsistent with
the execution status. It may be better to return "-EBUSY" when the call
to orinoco_lock() fails.
Bugzilla:
6 matches
Mail list logo