[PATCH 1/1] usb: usleep_range is preferred over udelay where wakeup is flexible

2015-06-25 Thread Sunny Kumar
According to Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt" udelay() is only called once from a place where sleeping is allowed. We can replace it with a call to usleep_range() with a reasonable upper limit. Signed-off-by: Sunny Kumar --- drivers/usb/storage/transport.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1

[PATCH 1/1] usb: usleep_range is preferred over udelay where wakeup is flexible

2015-06-25 Thread Sunny Kumar
According to Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt udelay() is only called once from a place where sleeping is allowed. We can replace it with a call to usleep_range() with a reasonable upper limit. Signed-off-by: Sunny Kumar sunny.kumar@gmail.com --- drivers/usb/storage/transport.c | 2 +-

Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: usleep_range is preferred over udelay where wakeup is flexible

2015-06-24 Thread Sunny Kumar
igned int pipe = srb->sc_data_direction == DMA_FROM_DEVICE ? > -- > 2.1.4 > >From 62bc3514ec4da51e7e766199d00de0594b17d23b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sunny Kumar Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 21:07:18 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] usb: usleep_range is preferred over udelay where wakeup is flexible According

Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: usleep_range is preferred over udelay where wakeup is flexible

2015-06-24 Thread Alan Stern
Please don't top-post. On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Sunny Kumar wrote: > Ok so what about putting lower limit to 125 and increase upper limit 200 Or even just 150. That would be fine. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to

Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: usleep_range is preferred over udelay where wakeup is flexible

2015-06-24 Thread Sunny Kumar
igned int pipe = srb->sc_data_direction == DMA_FROM_DEVICE ? > -- > 2.1.4 > >From 89648c1532e860b986fc5286245c404ddbe45b35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sunny Kumar Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 19:50:30 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] usb: usleep_range is preferred over udelay where wakeup is flexible

Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: usleep_range is preferred over udelay where wakeup is flexible

2015-06-24 Thread Alan Stern
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Sunny Kumar wrote: > According to Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt" > udelay() is only called once from a place where sleeping is allowed. > We can replace it with a call to usleep_range() > with a reasonable upper limit. > > Signed-off-by: Sunny Kumar > --- >

[PATCH 1/1] usb: usleep_range is preferred over udelay where wakeup is flexible

2015-06-24 Thread Sunny Kumar
According to Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt" udelay() is only called once from a place where sleeping is allowed. We can replace it with a call to usleep_range() with a reasonable upper limit. Signed-off-by: Sunny Kumar --- drivers/usb/storage/transport.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1

[PATCH 1/1] usb: usleep_range is preferred over udelay where wakeup is flexible

2015-06-24 Thread Sunny Kumar
According to Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt udelay() is only called once from a place where sleeping is allowed. We can replace it with a call to usleep_range() with a reasonable upper limit. Signed-off-by: Sunny Kumar sunny.kumar@gmail.com --- drivers/usb/storage/transport.c | 2 +-

Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: usleep_range is preferred over udelay where wakeup is flexible

2015-06-24 Thread Sunny Kumar
89648c1532e860b986fc5286245c404ddbe45b35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sunny Kumar sunny.kumar@gmail.com Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 19:50:30 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] usb: usleep_range is preferred over udelay where wakeup is flexible According to Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt udelay() is only called once from

Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: usleep_range is preferred over udelay where wakeup is flexible

2015-06-24 Thread Alan Stern
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Sunny Kumar wrote: According to Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt udelay() is only called once from a place where sleeping is allowed. We can replace it with a call to usleep_range() with a reasonable upper limit. Signed-off-by: Sunny Kumar

Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: usleep_range is preferred over udelay where wakeup is flexible

2015-06-24 Thread Alan Stern
Please don't top-post. On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Sunny Kumar wrote: Ok so what about putting lower limit to 125 and increase upper limit 200 Or even just 150. That would be fine. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to

Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: usleep_range is preferred over udelay where wakeup is flexible

2015-06-24 Thread Sunny Kumar
62bc3514ec4da51e7e766199d00de0594b17d23b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sunny Kumar sunny.kumar@gmail.com Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 21:07:18 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] usb: usleep_range is preferred over udelay where wakeup is flexible According to Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt udelay() is only called once from