* Len Brown wrote:
> void x86_init_rdrand(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_RANDOM
> unsigned long tmp;
> - int i, count, ok;
> + int i;
>
> if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_RDRAND))
> - return; /* Nothing to do */
> + return;
>
* Len Brown l...@kernel.org wrote:
void x86_init_rdrand(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_RANDOM
unsigned long tmp;
- int i, count, ok;
+ int i;
if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_RDRAND))
- return; /* Nothing to do */
+
> If we trust built-in-self-test...
> why do we need to do this at all? We
> should check the return value at every call, anyway...
Yes, we do trust built-in-self-test.
Yes, we do check for errors on on every call, not just here in boot.
The sanity check at boot from the kernel allows Linux to
If we trust built-in-self-test...
why do we need to do this at all? We
should check the return value at every call, anyway...
Yes, we do trust built-in-self-test.
Yes, we do check for errors on on every call, not just here in boot.
The sanity check at boot from the kernel allows Linux to
On Sun, 2 Aug 2015, Jeff Epler wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:27:39AM -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> > if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_RDRAND))
> > - return; /* Nothing to do */
> > + return;
>
> Why remove this comment?
Because it's pointless.
--
To unsubscribe
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:27:39AM -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_RDRAND))
> - return; /* Nothing to do */
> + return;
Why remove this comment?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
On Fri 2015-07-31 11:27:39, Len Brown wrote:
> From: Len Brown
>
> x86_init_rdrand() was added with 2 goals:
>
> 1. Sanity check that the built-in-self-test circuit on the Digital
>Random Number Generator (DRNG) is not complaining. As RDRAND
>HW self-checks on every invocation, this
On Fri 2015-07-31 11:27:39, Len Brown wrote:
From: Len Brown len.br...@intel.com
x86_init_rdrand() was added with 2 goals:
1. Sanity check that the built-in-self-test circuit on the Digital
Random Number Generator (DRNG) is not complaining. As RDRAND
HW self-checks on every
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:27:39AM -0400, Len Brown wrote:
if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_RDRAND))
- return; /* Nothing to do */
+ return;
Why remove this comment?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
On Sun, 2 Aug 2015, Jeff Epler wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:27:39AM -0400, Len Brown wrote:
if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_RDRAND))
- return; /* Nothing to do */
+ return;
Why remove this comment?
Because it's pointless.
--
To unsubscribe from this
From: Len Brown
x86_init_rdrand() was added with 2 goals:
1. Sanity check that the built-in-self-test circuit on the Digital
Random Number Generator (DRNG) is not complaining. As RDRAND
HW self-checks on every invocation, this goal is achieved
by simply invoking RDRAND and checking
From: Len Brown len.br...@intel.com
x86_init_rdrand() was added with 2 goals:
1. Sanity check that the built-in-self-test circuit on the Digital
Random Number Generator (DRNG) is not complaining. As RDRAND
HW self-checks on every invocation, this goal is achieved
by simply invoking
12 matches
Mail list logo
