Re: [PATCH 1/2][v3] e1000e: Leverage direct_complete to speed up s2ram

Hi Kai-Heng, On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 09:06:19PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > > --- > > v2: Added test data and some commit log revise(Paul Menzel) > >Only skip the suspend/resume if the NIC is not a wake up device specified > >by the user(Kai-Heng Feng) > > v3: Leverage direct complete

Re: [PATCH 1/2][v3] e1000e: Leverage direct_complete to speed up s2ram

Hi Yu, > On Dec 1, 2020, at 09:21, Chen Yu wrote: > > The NIC is put in runtime suspend status when there is no cable connected. > As a result, it is safe to keep non-wakeup NIC in runtime suspended during > s2ram because the system does not rely on the NIC plug event nor WoL to wake > up the

[PATCH 1/2][v3] e1000e: Leverage direct_complete to speed up s2ram

The NIC is put in runtime suspend status when there is no cable connected. As a result, it is safe to keep non-wakeup NIC in runtime suspended during s2ram because the system does not rely on the NIC plug event nor WoL to wake up the system. Besides that, unlike the s2idle, s2ram does not need to