On 08/05/13 14:26, Jason Cooper wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:53:41AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
I'm not entirely sure on this. The property described is still true for
the device, even if the kernel's not using that information now. My
feeling would be to keep them, unless there's a plan
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:53:41AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 02:09:04AM +0100, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > DT Maintainers,
> >
> > It's been a week with no comment. Shall I assume it's ok to apply
> > this?
>
> Apologies for the delay, still catching up on binding review.
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 02:09:04AM +0100, Jason Cooper wrote:
> DT Maintainers,
>
> It's been a week with no comment. Shall I assume it's ok to apply
> this?
Apologies for the delay, still catching up on binding review.
I'm not entirely sure on this. The property described is still true for
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 02:09:04AM +0100, Jason Cooper wrote:
DT Maintainers,
It's been a week with no comment. Shall I assume it's ok to apply
this?
Apologies for the delay, still catching up on binding review.
I'm not entirely sure on this. The property described is still true for
the
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:53:41AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 02:09:04AM +0100, Jason Cooper wrote:
DT Maintainers,
It's been a week with no comment. Shall I assume it's ok to apply
this?
Apologies for the delay, still catching up on binding review.
I'm not
On 08/05/13 14:26, Jason Cooper wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:53:41AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
I'm not entirely sure on this. The property described is still true for
the device, even if the kernel's not using that information now. My
feeling would be to keep them, unless there's a plan
DT Maintainers,
It's been a week with no comment. Shall I assume it's ok to apply
this?
thx,
Jason.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:31:04AM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 12:54:12PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > DMA_MEMSET support has been removed, so update the
DT Maintainers,
It's been a week with no comment. Shall I assume it's ok to apply
this?
thx,
Jason.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:31:04AM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 12:54:12PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
DMA_MEMSET support has been removed, so update the device
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 12:54:12PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> DMA_MEMSET support has been removed, so update the device tree files
> and corresponding binding documentation for Marvell SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth
> ---
> Cc: Russell King
> Cc: Jason Cooper
> Cc:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 12:54:12PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
DMA_MEMSET support has been removed, so update the device tree files
and corresponding binding documentation for Marvell SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth sebastian.hesselba...@gmail.com
---
Cc: Russell King
DMA_MEMSET support has been removed, so update the device tree files
and corresponding binding documentation for Marvell SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth
---
Cc: Russell King
Cc: Jason Cooper
Cc: Andrew Lunn
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni
Cc: Gregory CLEMENT
Cc:
DMA_MEMSET support has been removed, so update the device tree files
and corresponding binding documentation for Marvell SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth sebastian.hesselba...@gmail.com
---
Cc: Russell King li...@arm.linux.org.uk
Cc: Jason Cooper ja...@lakedaemon.net
Cc: Andrew Lunn
12 matches
Mail list logo
